|
|
|
#2 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,712
vCash: 1000 |
I will likely be in the minority, but I would lean towards Eubank in a very close and likely slow paced match that the masses would call a let down boring type of fight. It might be a thing of artistry, but likely would not produce a ton of sparks.
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,712
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Michael Nunn if he can't manage to beat Steve Little and Frankie liles how is he going to be Eubank??? Neither applies, pick who you like but please apply different logic! |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 168
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,048
vCash: 1000 |
Chris would Hate Nunns Style, Chris much preferred someone coming to him, he often lunged off balance when trying to catch "Retreaters" - as much as i distrust Nunns Chin, i think the Nunn who beat Frank Tate beats Chris, i think there would be a lot of Dead Time Posing. a Smirking Contest may break out so may need a strong ref to keep the action going.
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
NSB defector
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,610
vCash: 500 |
I think Nunn' reach, whipping flurries and ability to move in and out quick would seal the deal here. I actually imagine Nunn winning emphatically and Eubank finishing the fight with a puffy face, Thompson II style.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|