|
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Napoles or Leonard, who is the more skilled ? | |||
| Napoles |
|
8 | 38.10% |
| SRL |
|
8 | 38.10% |
| tough to say |
|
5 | 23.81% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#4 |
|
Vicious & Malicious
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,436
vCash: 1000 |
But seriously, Napoles is seriously impressive. Very fluid, but gets hit more than Leonard.
Napoles fought from what, 135-160 (even if once and a loss)? He lost plenty along the way against lesser opposition at the lower weights. Don't know the details behind those losses, but Leonard's loss in his prime was against a demon on a mission in Duran the first fight. Leonard, by the time he was a middle, was inconsistent and half the fighter he was at welter... As pointed out in the other thread, Leonard didn't carry his skill, or better put, he wasn't as effective at higher weights. I don't know. I'd say the biggest thing that separates them is Leonard's better defense. I'm interested to hear what smarter people than me have to say on the matter... |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Vicious & Malicious
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,436
vCash: 1000 |
Napoles was pretty flashy himself... I'm always impressed with Napoles. Great counterpuncher. Real fluid.
I think he reached too far at welter. Question: Did he go up to welter out of necessity, or for money/challenge? Could he have continued to make 135 or 140 for longer? |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 788
vCash: 1000 |
I'm one of the few who wasn't overly impressed with Jose. I though he largely ignored developing a good jab due to his skills at counterpunching, and while he hit hard with both hands I thought for all he had that he wasn't a complete combination puncher. Stamina, hard hitter, unique slipping and his own footwork, but I would favor Benitez, Luis Rodrigues at his best, and maybe a smaller Pryor over him.
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,099
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Leonard was more talented but Napoles was more skilled in my estimation. He was not a young, superbly talented 5'10 welterweight with explosive speed, yet he did rather well at 147. A video I made of him: [ame]***********.youtube.com/watch?v=GR-kuFNSXrA[/ame] Last edited by TheGreatA; 08-14-2012 at 06:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Vicious & Malicious
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,436
vCash: 1000 |
Great vid, A-
You gotta love a fighter who mixes it up and chooses to bang like Napoles. He sure didn't have to. He had the skills to be patient, box and move, take much less punishment, and win the easy way. He chose to win the fun way, the entertaining way. Gotta respect that. |
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 12,960
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|