Top Five Greatest Fighters Ever

[lufcrazy]

so now you're grading posters on how "lufcrazy" they are

Quality stuff frank

[frankenfrank]

Originally Posted by lufcrazy

so now you're grading posters on how "lufcrazy" they are

Quality stuff frank

next time it might b some1 else (?) of u

[lufcrazy]

Originally Posted by frankenfrank

next time it might b some1 else (?) of u

How do grade yourself as a lufcrazy?

Are you a heavy handed lufcrazy or a feather fisted lufcrazy

[SBleeder]

Originally Posted by frankenfrank

how did i 4get about u , it must b coz of your low post output , yes , u'r a luf 2 , I just do not know which tier , probably tier #1

[frankenfrank]

Originally Posted by lufcrazy

How do grade yourself as a lufcrazy?

Are you a heavy handed lufcrazy or a feather fisted lufcrazy

i do not rank myself within d lufcrazy scale , but if 4ced 2 extend it , a lighter hitting Ivan Calderon is still not good enough comparison 2 my lufcrazyness

[lufcrazy]

Originally Posted by frankenfrank

i do not rank myself within d lufcrazy scale , but if 4ced 2 extend it , a lighter hitting Ivan Calderon is still not good enough comparison 2 my lufcrazyness

Legendary stuff frank

[Flea Man]

Originally Posted by Kittikasem

On what basis do you say this?

Louis reigned in a piss-weak division, and still found time to get knocked out in his prime by Max Schmeling.

You could make arguments for Pep, Monzon, Robinson, and more, it's not clear-cut.

And what's more important than 'dominance'? Resume is. And Ezzard Charles has Louis beat HANDS DOWN in this, THE most important one of all.

Wouldn't say it was 'piss weak' even if his activity meant he faced some stiffs.

[Bill Butcher]

The top 5 I`ve seen on film are.....

Robinson
Armstrong
Ali
Pep
Duran

[frankenfrank]

BTW , there's another way 2 measure it , integrating over your vcash as a real function of time as a variable : S (vcash(t)*t) dt
with your join date being d left border and current date being d right border .


but there is a more sophisticated formula , with vcash(t) replaced by 0 4 non betting members or members whom bet less than 6 times in a year

[Bill Butcher]

Originally Posted by TheSouthpaw

1. Louis
2. Ali
3. Duran
4. Berrera
5.Frazier

**** off

Ps. its Barrera

[lufcrazy]

Originally Posted by frankenfrank

BTW , there's another way 2 measure it , integrating over your vcash as a real function of time as a variable : S (vcash(t)*t) dt
with your join date being d left border and current date being d right border .


but there is a more sophisticated formula , with vcash(t) replaced by 0 4 non betting members or members whom bet less than 6 times in a year

You win me over with your talk of maths. However you assume that bets are always made with the intention of winning.

I bet all mine on malignaggi knocking out khan because I was drunk and felt lucky. I've not really bet since.

Still though, I love the maths

[frankenfrank]

Originally Posted by lufcrazy

You win me over with your talk of maths. However you assume that bets are always made with the intention of winning.

I bet all mine on malignaggi knocking out khan because I was drunk and felt lucky. I've not really bet since.

Still though, I love the maths

This flawed system allowed and allows u 2 fully reverse your mistake , which makes your loss all d more telling .

Notice I do not follow d sport like most general forum posters and a few classic members do , but still .

And all of my bets were on "boxing" events .

[frankenfrank]

And then 1 can simply measure his kok's n egs' common volume and it will indic8 on his .. well .

I believe that there is a significant positive corel8ion between this volume , vcash and replies here .

[Senor Pepe']

The Greatest 'Fighter',

Jack Dempsey
Rocky Marciano
Joe Louis
Roberto Duran
Ray Robinson

[frankenfrank]

Originally Posted by Senor Pepe'

The Greatest 'Fighter',

Jack Dempsey
Rocky Marciano
Joe Louis
Roberto Duran
Ray Robinson

That was really bad , did not expect this from u . Very bad .