Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum Lounge European British Aussie MMA Classic Training
Go Back   East Side Boxing Forum > Other > MMA Forum

 
  


View Poll Results: Is Greg killing the sport?
Yes 9 23.68%
No 15 39.47%
Some fights are dull, but plenty are exciting 8 21.05%
Fuck off Johnstown! 6 15.79%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-10-2012, 11:50 PM   #61
CarlesX7
Shit got real!
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Inside the bubble ;)
Posts: 18,883
vCash: 75
Default Re: Is Greg Jackson killing the sport?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rekcutnevets View Post
You seem to be suggesting that I'm wanting someone to just wage in, and go shot for shot until someone gets knocked out. That is not what I am advocating.
I am not suggesting anything, man. You're practicallly saying it, just phrasing it in another way. It seems to me that the only way you would have been pleased with Condit, would be only if he stood in front of Diaz and traded until someone got knocked out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rekcutnevets View Post
This is an mma thread, but you bring up boxing and Oliver McCall. If I were fighting Oliver McCall, I would try to choke him out. Fuck going for the knock out, but you can't do that in boxing. Anyway, I always liked boxing. It was 1989 when I began to follow the sport seriously. It didn't take me long to find out who Pernell Whitaker was. Whitaker became my favorite fighter.

Pernell won more fights by decision than he did by knock out, but he still followed the rule that I hold mma fighters by. Whitaker didn't hit with concussive power. Still, Whitaker beat people up. Whitaker had a great jab, a consistent body attack, good counters, and good combinations.

Condit may have 26 of 28 wins inside the distance, but he "fought" Diaz as though he were playing tag. Pernell would have been ashamed of Condit's effort. There was no run and gun, it was just run and run.

You may like watching people win using a gimmick, but I don't. What I saw is a man that would have been hunted down if the bout were held without a time limit.
I think you understood why I used the McCall example. If you know beforehand that it's virtually impossible to finish your opponent, there's nothing wrong with going for a points win. Diaz is one of those fighters, you can't finish the guy. I understand you were disappointed to see Condit outpoint Diaz, but it is what it is.
CarlesX7 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-11-2012, 09:21 AM   #62
rekcutnevets
Black Sash
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: InYourMouth, NC
Posts: 6,550
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Is Greg Jackson killing the sport?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haggis McJackass View Post
Run and run, and outland your opponent, and use a greater variety of strikes, and land the harder shots, and make him look like a one-dimensional clueless fool.


http://www.news10.net/images/640/360..._condit640.jpg

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/entry_photo...arge_large.jpg

http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/4xi...412condit4.jpg


Anyone can play that game.

http://i.usatoday.net/sports/_photos...EE-x-large.jpg

http://cdn0.sbnation.com/imported_as...llery_post.jpg

http://www.cagetoday.com/wp-content/..._nick_diaz.jpg

There was way too much of this:
http://i39.tinypic.com/2mzz9nd.gif

C'mon, don't be scared homie.
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lz...xnapo1_500.gif
rekcutnevets is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 09:32 AM   #63
rekcutnevets
Black Sash
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: InYourMouth, NC
Posts: 6,550
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Is Greg Jackson killing the sport?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlesX7 View Post
I am not suggesting anything, man. You're practicallly saying it, just phrasing it in another way. It seems to me that the only way you would have been pleased with Condit, would be only if he stood in front of Diaz and traded until someone got knocked out.


I think you understood why I used the McCall example. If you know beforehand that it's virtually impossible to finish your opponent, there's nothing wrong with going for a points win. Diaz is one of those fighters, you can't finish the guy. I understand you were disappointed to see Condit outpoint Diaz, but it is what it is.
No, you don't understand. I don't care who won that fight. It doesn't bother me that fights go the distance. Unless it involves my kids playing outside, I hate watching someone play tag.

I have no problem with the way Machida fought Jon Jones or Rashad Evans. I have a problem with the way he played tag against Tito Ortiz, and put out no effort to win the 1st two rounds of his fight with Jackson. I had no problem with the way Machida fought the 3rd round against Jackson.

There is a difference in fighting intelligently and outright running away from someone.
rekcutnevets is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 08:07 AM   #64
BlackBrenny
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,737
vCash: 75
Default Re: Is Greg Jackson killing the sport?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoo View Post
Not my words, but Dana cant be happy after Clay v Grey and Diaz v Condit and now having to cancel a PPV. Shit costs money

Dana talks too fucking much, let him get in the cage and do it
BlackBrenny is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 06:36 PM   #65
Haggis McJackass
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,502
vCash: 177
Default Re: Is Greg Jackson killing the sport?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rekcutnevets View Post
Anyone can play that game.

There was way too much of this:
http://i39.tinypic.com/2mzz9nd.gif

C'mon, don't be scared homie.
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lz...xnapo1_500.gif
Well, there's the small fact that Condit threw and landed more significant strikes, and did more damage.

Unfortunately, you don't get points for attempting to slap your opponent, or for showing frustration that your fight isn't going well and you're too one-dimensional to adjust your tactics.

Condit won the fight. He fought tactically, but it was no Khalib Starnes or whatever the fuck his name is. But Condit threw more, landed more, scored more and dictated the terms of the fight.

Haggis McJackass is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 10:57 PM   #66
rekcutnevets
Black Sash
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: InYourMouth, NC
Posts: 6,550
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Is Greg Jackson killing the sport?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haggis McJackass View Post
Well, there's the small fact that Condit threw and landed more significant strikes, and did more damage.

Unfortunately, you don't get points for attempting to slap your opponent, or for showing frustration that your fight isn't going well and you're too one-dimensional to adjust your tactics.

Condit won the fight. He fought tactically, but it was no Khalib Starnes or whatever the fuck his name is. But Condit threw more, landed more, scored more and dictated the terms of the fight.

What are you arguing? Where in this thread have I disputed the decision? I don't like the way Condit fought, plain and simple. Condit wasn't trying to win a fight, he was trying win a timed affair using a gimmick.

Condit could have done so much better. This gif, that I posted earlier, shows too much of what went on:

http://i39.tinypic.com/2mzz9nd.gif

Condit could have landed some damaging counters there, but was too committed to hauling ass. There were many more examples like this during the bout.

You also act like Condit blew Diaz away in the stats. Diaz outlanded Condit 62-55 to the head, and 49-36 to the body. Condit pulled away with leg kicks. Condit out landed Diaz 68-6 in leg kicks, 50 of which were considered to be leg jabs. Leg kicks count. These kicks were not like Aldo vs Faber, or Shogun vs Machida in their first fight, but they were worth something. Still, there was no blow out here, and the "damage" you mentioned was mostly superficial.

You can argue Condit won, but he did not look like the better fighter. Condit looked like he was outmatched everywhere except for speed, and he took advantage of this to win on points inside a certain time limit. You know, the let the bell save me from you sort of deal.
rekcutnevets is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 11:01 PM   #67
chimba
Off the Somali Coast
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 20,201
vCash: 800
Default Re: Is Greg Jackson killing the sport?

Were the fans boing the fight and Condit? If yes Recks is right. I love MMA, I dont want it to be booed.
chimba is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 11:45 PM   #68
Haggis McJackass
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,502
vCash: 177
Default Re: Is Greg Jackson killing the sport?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rekcutnevets View Post
What are you arguing? Where in this thread have I disputed the decision? I don't like the way Condit fought, plain and simple. Condit wasn't trying to win a fight, he was trying win a timed affair using a gimmick.
Fair enough. It's all just opinion after all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rekcutnevets View Post
Condit could have done so much better. This gif, that I posted earlier, shows too much of what went on:

http://i39.tinypic.com/2mzz9nd.gif

Condit could have landed some damaging counters there, but was too committed to hauling ass. There were many more examples like this during the bout.

You also act like Condit blew Diaz away in the stats. Diaz outlanded Condit 62-55 to the head, and 49-36 to the body. Condit pulled away with leg kicks. Condit out landed Diaz 68-6 in leg kicks, 50 of which were considered to be leg jabs. Leg kicks count. These kicks were not like Aldo vs Faber, or Shogun vs Machida in their first fight, but they were worth something. Still, there was no blow out here, and the "damage" you mentioned was mostly superficial.

You can argue Condit won, but he did not look like the better fighter. Condit looked like he was outmatched everywhere except for speed, and he took advantage of this to win on points inside a certain time limit. You know, the let the bell save me from you sort of deal.
Most of this is true.

Still, I had no problem with the way Condit fought. After all, this isn't a "fight" as such, it's a fight sport. Maybe Diaz would fuck Condit up on the street, but we're not looking to find out who beats whose ass on the street. Diaz knew the environment and the rules of the contest. He knew what the judges were looking for. The onus was on him to impose HIS fight plan on Condit.

And Condit didn't run IMO. He avoided close-quarters exchanges, sure. He was quick to reclaim the centre of the octagon whenever he got pressed up against the cage. But he fought as well. He landed more power shots to the head than Diaz did (as I recall.) He threw kicks and punches and elbows with intent to hurt Diaz. And I think that afterwards, Diaz looked like he'd been in a five-round fight.

Haggis McJackass is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

East Side Boxing Forum > Other > MMA Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump








All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013