Should a workout consist of exercises that use all anatomical planes of movement?

[brown bomber]

'if you are doing a bicep curl to deltoid/ tricep press in the frontal plain and you let go of the weights when they are over your head- will they float in mid air supported by a mysterious magic force or will they fall to the ground?'

[Cut Me Mick]

Originally Posted by Melchior

Someone is embarrased huh CMT.

Embarrassed*

[Cut Me Mick]

Originally Posted by brown bomber

'if you are doing a bicep curl to deltoid/ tricep press in the frontal plain and you let go of the weights when they are over your head- will they float in mid air supported by a mysterious magic force or will they fall to the ground?'

I don't get it?

[brown bomber]

Originally Posted by Cut Me Mick

I don't get it?

A stupid question, with an obvious answer - using anatomical terminology..... Familiar?

[Cut Me Mick]

Originally Posted by brown bomber

A stupid question, with an obvious answer - using anatomical terminology..... Familiar?

My original question was that for a workout, should you work the muscles using every anatomical plane of movement. I don't get why that is a question worthy of the piss taking you have been giving?

Instead of helping you decided to be a complete abusive asshole, and then even started pulling rank. You really haven't made yourself come across well in this thread. I have never met you, yet i think your a complete knob, who is the last person i would approach for fitness advice.

[brown bomber]

Originally Posted by Cut Me Mick

My original question was that for a workout, should you work the muscles using every anatomical plane of movement. I don't get why that is a question worthy of the piss taking you have been giving?

Instead of helping you decided to be a complete abusive asshole, and then even started pulling rank. You really haven't made yourself come across well in this thread. I have never met you, yet i think your a complete knob, who is the last person i would approach for fitness advice.

Once again look at your replies... You called me a twat first because you were embarrassed about your stupid question. I'm not bothered what you think - your an idiot ... I help a lot of people here but you can go fuck yourself

[Cut Me Mick]

Originally Posted by brown bomber

Once again look at your replies... You called me a twat first because you were embarrassed about your stupid question. I'm not bothered what you think - your an idiot ... I help a lot of people here but you can go fuck yourself

I am not embarrassed about what asked, why should i be?

I called you a twat because that's exactly what you are; a big, bulging, belching vagina.

Do me and yourself a favour, in future don't even consider posting in a thread i make. It will make both our lives easier, because your a cunt and you probably feel the same about me.

[brown bomber]

Originally Posted by Cut Me Mick

I am not embarrassed about what asked, why should i be?

I called you a twat because that's exactly what you are; a big, bulging, belching vagina.

Do me and yourself a favour, in future don't even consider posting in a thread i make. It will make both our lives easier, because your a cunt and you probably feel the same about me.

Welcome to my ignore lost you twat

[Cut Me Mick]

Originally Posted by brown bomber

Welcome to my ignore lost you twat

list*

[Fredd]

Strong ability to overcomplicate things.

[Cut Me Mick]

Originally Posted by Fredd

Strong ability to overcomplicate things.

Welcome to the fitness industry.

[withoutwire]

Originally Posted by Cut Me Mick

I am not embarrassed about what asked, why should i be?

I called you a twat because that's exactly what you are; a big, bulging, belching vagina.

Do me and yourself a favour, in future don't even consider posting in a thread i make. It will make both our lives easier, because your a cunt and you probably feel the same about me.

I don't really like grammar Nazis but since you were doing it to people...

*"...what you are: a big, bulging,..."

*"you're a cunt"