Manny Pacquiao is a More accurate Power puncher than Floyd Mayweather.

[D4thincarnation]

Originally Posted by GOW7

Yeah the numbers don't match with compubox released punch stats. Philla lose the alt please. You tried this bullshit before and got owned. Don't think posing as someone else is going to help.

Think you will find they are the compubox number fool.

Prove me wrong if you think they are false.

Truth hurts, so you are in denial

[Elliot]

Originally Posted by D4thincarnation

Not at all, throwing combos, make it much harder to land all, pot shoting makes it easy just to land the single punch.

Plus Mayweather is countering, bigger target to aim for because the guard is down.

As the attack Pacquiao has smaller gaps to get through because the guard is up.

By hitting someone they open up more, hence why a strong jab is so effective.

If Pac misses the first but throws five he will hit three or four.

[rayrobinson]

Originally Posted by D4thincarnation

Think you will find they are the compubox number fool.

Prove me wrong if you think they are false.

Truth hurts, so you are in denial

This is a good thread,

Please post total numbers of punches landed.

i would like to see the Jab accuracy , and that wasnt a leading question .

[bballchump11]

Originally Posted by rayrobinson

why would there be any difference?

a fight that's ended by winning being 1/1 and KO1 shouldn't be weighted as much as somebody going 12 rounds and landing 200/200 punches

[D4thincarnation]

Originally Posted by rayrobinson

This is a good thread,

Please post total numbers of punches landed.

i would like to see the Jab accuracy , and that wasnt a leading question .

The jab count can be misleading that why compubox have power punches and jabs in separate stats.

Pacquiao an aggressor uses the jab as a range finder, to move his opponents guard to open it, as a feint or to blind his opponent.

Mayweather a defensive fighter use his jab much more as a point scorer.

Also southpaw's are much more up against the opposite jab hand which can cancel each other out, while the orthodox fighter will more often face an orthodox fighter and will have more room to throw the jab.

[D4thincarnation]

Originally Posted by bballchump11

a fight that's ended by winning being 1/1 and KO1 shouldn't be weighted as much as somebody going 12 rounds and landing 200/200 punches

Why not, he knocked the guy out with one punch, the the other guy landed 200 power punches and couldn't KO his opponent, even though he couldn't miss.

But also reminds me, that powerful punches are much harder to land an Pacquiao lands with power whilst Mayweather just lands, making Pacquiao's edge even more impressive.

[bballchump11]

Originally Posted by D4thincarnation

Why not, he knocked the guy out with one punch, the the other guy landed 200 power punches and couldn't KO his opponent, even though he couldn't miss.

But also reminds me, that powerful punches are much harder to land an Pacquiao lands with power whilst Mayweather just lands, making Pacquiao's edge even more impressive.

whatever floats your boat. Nobody does it the way you do, but keep telling us this cool story

edit: oh and the point of the thread is who's more accurate

[oibighead]

Its a fact that Mayweather is a more accurate puncher than the wild swinging Pacquiao.

Why have all the pactards suddenly left pacland and invaded ESB again?

[D4thincarnation]

Originally Posted by oibighead

Its a fact that Mayweather is a more accurate puncher than the wild swinging Pacquiao.

Why have all the pactards suddenly left pacland and invaded ESB again?

So you are just ignoring the stats and reasoning.

[Bladegunner]

Originally Posted by oibighead

Its a fact that Mayweather is a more accurate puncher than the wild swinging Pacquiao.

Why have all the pactards suddenly left pacland and invaded ESB again?

I think they had a group meeting and said it was time to rise from the dead.

[rayrobinson]

Originally Posted by bballchump11

a fight that's ended by winning being 1/1 and KO1 shouldn't be weighted as much as somebody going 12 rounds and landing 200/200 punches

Ball , its the same percentage, and that is what we are measuring not total output, but accuracy.

Also both had the same amount of stoppages I think so its a level comparison.

[D4thincarnation]

Originally Posted by bballchump11

whatever floats your boat. Nobody does it the way you do, but keep telling us this cool story

edit: oh and the point of the thread is who's more accurate

You welcome to do the maths if you want?

But my way is fairer.

If Hatton had a granite chin, Pacquiao probably increase the percentage as he tires.

If Oscar doesn't quit that accuracy just goes up and up, as those hands get further apart and drop.

You know it is right.

[JDK]

There are so many wrong things in this thread I don't even know where to start.
This guy has the weirdest idea what boxing is.
I'm assuming a troll thread.

[D4thincarnation]

Originally Posted by JDK

There are so many wrong things in this thread I don't even know where to start.
This guy has the weirdest idea what boxing is.
I'm assuming a troll thread.

Send your complaints to compubox

[rayrobinson]

Originally Posted by oibighead

Its a fact that Mayweather is a more accurate puncher than the wild swinging Pacquiao.

Why have all the pactards suddenly left pacland and invaded ESB again?

I havent checked but if they are the numbers then so be it , having a pre conceived idea of a fighter is one thing , but if the numbers tell a different story ...