|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: OUT BOXED - Marquez vs Pacquiao 3 or Sergio Martinez vs Julio Cesar Chavez jr? | |||
| Marquez vs Pacquiao 3 |
|
5 | 15.63% |
| Martinez vs Chavez jr |
|
27 | 84.38% |
| Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,088
vCash: 75 |
Even minus the "post-fight facial evidence" everybody who have seen both fights will agree that it's Martinez, simply bec it was utter domination.
JMM had tons of moments against Pac but did have good rounds too. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LosAngeles
Posts: 11,457
vCash: 75 |
The thread starter tried to paint a picture that Marquez-Pacquiao was not a robbery because it was'nt as one sided as Martinez-Chavez.........
He failed!!!! ![]() ![]() By far the most impressive of the two was Marquez' schooling of a consensus p4p'er, #1 in many opinions at the time. Canelo Alvarez dominated Shane Mosley more than Martinez dominated Chavez, it does'nt make his performance more impressive when you consider Mosley by far has seen his better days. |
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
ESB Official Gif Poster
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 22,413
vCash: 920 |
Quote:
Example: Mayweather-Gatti v Mayweather-Cotto. Mayweather dominated Gatti, didn't lose a round, didn't lose an exchange en route to a stoppage. However, Cotto was competitive with Mayweather. Mayweather picked up a close but very clear decision. Does this mean that the Gatti victory tops the Cotto victory? Nope. Mayweather-Cotto displayed 10 times more skill, technique and intelligence in it. Was competed at a much higher level. Was competitive, but, it is much harder to put skills in to practice against an opponent who is also highly skilled. Marquez-Pacquiao >>>>>>>>>>>>> Martinez-Chavez Jr. Above. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|