|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,498
vCash: 177 |
Based on what, exactly?
And when was the peak? Two or three years ago? Call me when Fox isn't showing MMA cards anymore. You'll have to wait a minimum of six years for that, of course. ![]() Quote:
You mean....... as it was before Zuffa? Within the span of many active, still-relevant fighter's careers? ![]() When you loved it and everything was great?
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,498
vCash: 177 |
It's not true. This is coming from a guy who:
1) Reckons that bodybuilding is a bigger deal than MMA. 2) Has the logo of a failed MMA organization (that the UFC replaced as the major brand in the sport) tattooed on his arm. (No joke) 3) Won't say anything positive about the UFC or what it has done for the sport, ever. 4) Is so holplessly biased that he doesn't think that Brock Lesnar should be in the UFC Hall of Fame.
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Battery Park
Posts: 15,219
vCash: 1080 |
Quote:
Oh,the irony,but don't allow FACTS get in your way.
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
ESB 2002 Club
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By any means necessary
Posts: 43,277
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 987
vCash: 1300 |
Quote:
It would not matter how well any MMA org ran itself as the sport progresses & becomes more mainstream it looses its raw appeal and in doing so becomes less of an event. |
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,198
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I agree that if SF close its door it isn't a good thing. I'm all for a ruling major organisation but the smaller orgs are needed to breed competition. Many will come and many will go just like promotions in boxing. We still have a thirst to watch a good fight but these businesses are being run poorly and thats what it comes down to. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,817
vCash: 1000 |
Strikeforce not yet licensed for Nov. 3 show
Quote:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] |
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,498
vCash: 177 |
Quote:
I'm a fan of the UFC and what it has done for the sport, sure. Should I apologize for not being a hater? But I'm not a blind nuthugger. They do plenty of shit that I disapprove of. But they also provide me the opportunity to enjoy regular MMA cards on my TV, which NEVER happened pre-Zuffa. The FACTS are that they try to stifle competition and run the entire sport by themselves. So what? What are they supposed to do? Encourage competing orgs to challenge them? Dilute their product across two or three or four banners? ![]() The UFC has brought MUCH greater profile and legitimacy to MMA than it has ever had before. Because of the success they have had, they open the door for smaller local promotions to spring up across the world. If one of those promotions is better run and becomes a rival, good. Competition is good. If not, then all the top fighters will be in one org fighting for ONE recognized "king of the division" belt. As opposed to Condit, Diaz and GSP all calling themselves world champions of different orgs and never fighting each other.
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Rationalist by default...
East Side Guru
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,895
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
FFS why do I get into these worthless argument again.... Haggis you are prolly one of the only people here that think PPV rating and popularity should come into question for being HOF worthy. The thing you don't seems to understand is that since the UFC will reign supreme alot of people will consider the UFC HOF like the MMA HOF... Seriously...Lesnar in any HOF is a fuckin disgrace Don't even bring the belt and the 2 shitty title defence in what could be called one of the worst weight division of all time into the argument because you are diggin you own freaking grave with those... |
|
|
|
|
#28 | ||
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,498
vCash: 177 |
Quote:
Are we talking about the Hall of Guys Who Kicked the Most Ass and Had the Most Well-Rounded Skillsets and the Longest Careers and Oh Yeah, Scurla and Neville Have To Like Them As Well? No. It's the Hall of Fame. So the most famous champion in MMA history must be in there. End of story. How anyone can dispute that is beyond me. Why? Oh yeah, because you don't like the guy. That's right. ![]() Quote:
So we're not allowed to consider his in-cage accomplishments. (Brock defended twice - no UFC HW has yet managed 3 in a row) And we're not allowed to consider his impact on the sport either, or the unparalleled attention he drew to his fights. So basically, your argument (and scurla's) is "Fuck Brock Lesnar, I don't like him." And that's it, that's your entire argument. ![]()
Last edited by Haggis McJackass; 10-10-2012 at 10:45 PM. |
||
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Semi-neutralist Overseer
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: From the Lands Down Under.
Posts: 22,498
vCash: 177 |
Never. Why would he?
![]() Can't say I'm too gutted about Strikeforce folding, though I enjoyed the couple of shows of theirs that I saw. Meanwhile, I'd rather see Cormier and Melendez in big fights in the UFC rather than killing time away from the spotlight. Boxing doesn't have a unified promotional company, and I can't see how the competing promotions all trying to protect their fighters and fuck each other over has been good for the sport. Does anyone really think that MMA's #1 and #2 p4p guys could be in the same weight division in the UFC for years and never fight each other? ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|