|
|
|
#4 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,959
vCash: 4470 |
No , he could not .
Ali's style was 1 that relied on having size advantage and/or cheating and/or fighting severely lousy opponents and/or having a fix . Some combination of d above . |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 229
vCash: 460 |
I'm pretty sure if Lewis were to live and box in the same era as Ernie, he wouldn't weigh 245lbs. Take another example, Joe Bugner. 6'4" guy, weighed 230lbs against Ali. So yeah, I still believe Ali could handle Lewis' size pretty well.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Midlands in England
Posts: 3,814
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
. Plus check again and can people stop with this bilge -LENNOX LEWIS' PRIME FIGHTING WEIGHT WAS NOT 245lbs - his peak was anywhere from the 227lbs version up to 238 VERY MAX - the 245 Lennox was a big fat slob compared to that guy
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London,England
Posts: 10,623
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Exactly ! Ali would adapt like he did in so many other ways. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
Posts: 12,494
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Quote:
Now to clearify, I haven't a clue as to who would win.. Muhammad Ali will always be the better fighter in my mind, from the stand point of having greater accomplishments and doing better against the rest of the field. But I'm not confident in picking a winner between the two of them. |
||
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 229
vCash: 460 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,295
vCash: 1000 |
On the one hand I think Lewis would have been too much for Ali, but then I think of how an old Holyfield gave him a tough fight in the rematch...
These question are always hard, but Lewis and Wlad are the most difficult opponents for Ali that I can think of. Wlad even more so perhaps. |
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
Posts: 12,494
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Very good job at selectively highlighting only PART of my post... Now let's bring the rest of it to the table. Quote:
![]() And in either case, this is definitely trying to change the argument. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 229
vCash: 460 |
Well, that's what you did, right? Selected the part of my post which you didn't agree with, I thought it wouldn't be unfair for me to do the same thing. That wasn't my argument, that was my opininon on how Lewis would look like if he were to box in the same era as Ernie. Read what I first posted, what fg2227 posted after me and then my post we're talking about here (read it completely this time), and maybe you'll get my point.
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,172
vCash: 1000 |
Ali could handle the size as could Louis, Dempsey,Marciano and Frazier,and most of them have done so. The thing is could he beat a great big man such as Lewis or the Klitschko's, fighters who have had great amateur experience and learned the trade by making mistakes in the Pro arena and overcoming...Good question....How do great fighters overcome the advantages of another great fighter. I would think they take advantage of their own advantages and in Ali's case it would be speed of hand and movement as well as strength of mind and will to win.
My feeling is that he would do well but Lewis and the K's are a different breed of big man, another level...that being said, when great fights great, sometimes little intangibles can make a difference. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|