|
|
||||||||
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 380
vCash: 535 |
Quote:
Thanks for your answer mate! Can you explain the following tho? So how do you explain a guy like george forman hitting harder than mike Tyson, depite both men in their prime weighing the same and Tyson being MUCH faster with better technique and George being slow? Can you explain why Earnie Shavers hit the hardest out of everyone despite not weighing much for a HW and despite not being that fast? Can you explain why rocky marciano hit so hard for am man his size who was small and no especially fast. Can you explain why Julian Jackson hit so much harder than Roy Jones Jr despite weighing less and being slower, ? |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Saigon
Posts: 1,999
vCash: 3900 |
Quote:
Now, it's an incredible over-simplification but it may be necessary to illustrate the point - two guys, same mass, throw a punch but one has a weak arm and one a strong arm. The boxer with the strong arm hits with a very solid, rigid arm that successfully transfers all of his power to his opponent, in an instant. The other guy hits, but instead of delivering all of the force at the end of a solid arm, his weaker arm "buckles", and force is absorbed by his elbow joint, shoulder joint etc. Of course in reality a great deal more parts of your body than just your arm are important for delivering the force of your punch. There are many links along the chain that could be weak and reduce the impact. |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,695
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
This is a stupid question that can't be answered (especially not with the level of understanding being displayed here) because there are too many factors and individual circumstances. But if you'd like to listen to idiots claim that it's all about a simple equation like body weight x velocity then go ahead. |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,695
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 380
vCash: 535 |
Quote:
How do you find out the answer to this complex question? What do you study to know? Is there any literature specific in answering this question or is it mainly theories and no one really knows? |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,695
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
What is known is that for a throwing motion like a punch is that forces are summated and that your tendons multiply the speed and power. What this means is that your muscles need to perform work on preferably stiff tendons (Think of them as a thick rubber band), your muscles need to hold force at a high level to stretch and transfer the energy to your tendons. When you punch you generate force by pushing into the ground and transferring that force through your mid section before releasing it through your arm. The stretch between your hips and shoulders is extremely important, your hips need to stop before your shoulder twists into the punch; this ensures that you get a good stretch and recoil through your midsection. I believe that's where a lot of fighters fail in their punching chain, boxers are always taught that power comes from the legs and being fast... You see fast guys like Bradley or Malignaggi and people ask why they can't punch, they tend to punch with their hips and shoulders moving at the same time. You then look at someone like Golovkin or Pacman and you'll see that their hips are always very stable at the time they release their hands. Bradley and co. look fast but their fist at the point of impact isn't accelerating like Golovkin's or Julian Jacksons is. Golovkin and co. are multiplying their force through a throwing motion throughout the punch, Bradley and co. are moving quickly but pushing it from the waist up so forces don't summate. It's a coordination/motor movement issue primarily but strength is very important as well. It's not about how fast a guy is from A to B, it's about what is happening at the point of impact. A guy might be big and slow looking but if you look at how efficiently he summates his forces through the mechanisms I talked about then he may be a devastating puncher and his fist might be moving a lot faster at the point of impact than a guy like Andre Ward who is a fast body mover but again is slowly pushing a punch at the point of impact. Look at any good puncher form Foreman to Jackson and you'll notice the stability of the hips and that their fist seems to be gaining something as they're still connecting. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,219
vCash: 500 |
The recipe for power is God. If God chooses that you have power, you have it.
Everything that you have, God chose for you. If you want the answer, read the Gospel. |
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,219
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
I did lift weights for a decade. I got solid numbers, high pfp strength. But thank God I switched to calesthenics. You know, it was a blessing that I found out about advanced calesthenics. Hopefully, you find out about it too. Good luck and God bless. Take care of your body. |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,695
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 180
vCash: 1000 |
The reason why someone who is slower and lighter can hit harder than someone bigger and faster is because they transfer motion better. Basically technique.
|
|
|
|
#27 | |||||
|
Big & Slow
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,517
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
In your example, and in a real life example like the OP proposes, all things will not be equal. If one guys arm buckles, obviously he's not going to hit as hard as someone with a solid punch. However, my point is, arm strength (beyond the amount needed to deliver the punch in a technically perfect way) has nothing to do with it. Quote:
Quote:
1. Mass and weight are not the same thing. The mass of an object refers to the amount of matter that is contained by the object. The weight of an object is the force of gravity acting upon that object. Mass is related to how much stuff is there and weight is related to the pull of the Earth upon that stuff. The mass of an object (measured in kg) will be the same no matter where in the universe that object is located. Mass is never altered by location, the pull of gravity, speed or even the existence of other forces. For example, a 2-kg object will have a mass of 2 kg whether it is located on Earth, the moon, or Jupiter; its mass will be 2 kg whether it is moving or not (at least for purposes of our study); and its mass will be 2 kg whether it is being pushed upon or not. On the other hand, the weight of an object (measured in Newton) will vary according to where in the universe the object is. Weight depends upon which planet is exerting the force and the distance the object is from the planet. Weight, being equivalent to the force of gravity, is dependent upon the value of g - the gravitational field strength. On earth's surface g is 9.8 N/kg (often approximated as 10 N/kg). On the moon's surface, g is 1.7 N/kg. Go to another planet, and there will be another g value. Furthermore, the g value is inversely proportional to the distance from the center of the planet. So if we were to measure g at a distance of 400 km above the earth's surface, then we would find the g value to be less than 9.8 N/kg. (The nature of the force of gravity will be discussed in more detail in a later unit of The Physics Classroom.) Always be cautious of the distinction between mass and weight. It is the source of much confusion for many students of physics. 2. Force, Strength and Power are not the same thing. Force is the capacity to perform work. It has both quantity and direction. We would speak of "the force of gravity" for example. It is measured in newtons (N). Power is the rate at which work is done, commonly measured in Watts (W). Strength is generally the ability to resist deformation. It cam be measured in a number of ways, crushing strength for example may be measured in megapascals (MPa). Quote:
Quote:
If you don't want to watch the entire video, just watch the from where they show Houston Alexander to the end. They explain the entire process scientifically and very clearly. If it wasn't true then how do you explain a 140lb woman with a great ass punching harder than a 200lb male MMA fighter with ripped muscles? Its not magic. Its easily explainable by science. Don't let the 15yr old, wanking to porn in their rooms trolls on ESB sway you into thinking otherwise. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eplLem4jPs[/ame] Last edited by Slacker; 10-19-2012 at 07:40 AM. |
|||||
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Big & Slow
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,517
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
![]() As for the skinny wrist argument... how about this guy? You know, former wold champion and known badass, Tommy Hearns? He had skinny arms and small hands. http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images...jpg?1327692483 |
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Big & Slow
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,517
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
He had skinny ass arms but he was tall and had good reach. I'm sure if you go fact check you will see this is what Steward said. Steward showed him the same techniques he showed Lennox and Wlad (both monster punchers) and suddenly, *alakazam* Hearns turned into a powerhouse. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|