|
|
|
#31 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,734
vCash: 500 |
Round 10,
Again, Muhammad Ali fought as a 'dirty man', with numerous fouling. No less than '14-times' he cuffed Mr. Frazier behind the neck, and pulled at him. A total of 1:13 of the 3-minute Round, Mr. Ali fought very 'unclean'. Not one warning by Tony Perez, and he only slapped at Mr. Ali once. Clearly a round, in which Mr. Ali should have had at least '4' warnings, and at a minimum a 2-Point deduction. Joe Frazier won the round, and with proper penalties, it should have been a 10-7 Round, but with New York Scoring, it could have been called for Joe Frazier as a 3-point Round. |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,716
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Do you get off on this? |
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,712
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,040
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
I believe that had Perez taken a point for Ali after a couple of warnings that would have been fair. Then the fight probably changes. Ali either keeps holding and loses another point or understands that he must use different tactics. As far as the claim of racism ah...Joe Frazier was black too. That was a weak excuse by Perez. I do believe that the big $$ Ali brought in allowed him to get away with things like this and why he won so many close decisions. thats just the way boxing goes at times. Eddie Futch said that he and Joe never considered that fight a loss. |
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,716
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
As it was Frazier looked like he had stuck his head in a bees nest . Get real. |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,734
vCash: 500 |
A hold and a clinch is one thing.
And a boxer can usually get away with a couple of 'cuffs' behind his opponent's neck. But what Muhammad Ai did was perform in an 'unclean way' with 'intentional fouls', which deserves a penalty. Round 10 is a perfect round to view and analyze. Mr. Ali was obviously tired, and was attempting to ride out the round. His 'dirty tactics' were also 'flagrant stalls'. After the 4th 'cuffing foul', which lasted 9-seconds, Referee Perez clearly should have broken up the hold, and informed Mr. Ali that the 'foul' was way over the line, and one more time he would be deducted a point. Mr. Ali would go onto perform 10 more 'cuffing fouls' on Mr. Frazier. A Referee with balls, would have DQ'd Muhammad Ali. |
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,734
vCash: 500 |
If Muhammad Ali losses to Joe Frazier, by DQ or as a result of deducted points,
the Heavyweight Championship would have changed course. Smokin Joe Frazier would have gotten the October 1974 bout with George Foreman. Muhammad Ali would have been forced into a 3rd-Bout with Ken Norton, most likely in late-1974 or early-1975. George Foreman would have defeated Joe Frazier again (October 1974), and stated that he would fight the winner of the Ken Norton vs. Muhammad Ali III bout. Ken Norton and Muhammad Ali fight to a 12-Round Draw, and neither get a Title Shot. in 1975. |
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,687
vCash: 1000 |
Regardless of the source, Perez was having a bad night that night.
Ali's holding was excessive and illegal. He could have had signifcant points deducted because the holding was well past the point of issuing him a warning. It was deliberate and Ali continued doing it because he knew Perez didn't want to answer for it. Ali tried these tactics in the FOTC and Manilla. Both Mercante and Padilla warned him early in the fights for that. Joe might have hit the canvas in the second round if Ali was able to follow up his combination after hurting Frazier. Perez really screwed up here. I don't believe or agree with the Ali fans who claim he would've stopped Joe. That's just nonsense. Ali doesn't have the Foremanesque power to repeat the knockdowns. I think Joe would have got up and rallied to continue in the fight. At worst, maybe Ali scores a couple of knockdowns having Joe in real trouble, that's all. |
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,734
vCash: 500 |
Round 2,
Joe was stunned, but Muhammad Ali just didn't have that kind of finishing power. Round 5, Referee - Tony Perez was 'thinking' of warning Mr. Ali, but backed off. Mr. Ali had '12' more cuff-clinches, and was well on his way to setting some kind of World Record for 'cuffing', without getting a 'single-warning'. Just don't count the 'unclean fouling', but the amount of time spent by Mr. Ali using dirty and filthy tactics. 59-seconds of fouling in Round 5. Tony Perez went over to ringside 'again' to discuss the fouling with the NYSAC Officials, but Edwin Dooley said 'No, on any point deductions'. |
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,687
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
According to Joe, Ali had no zip or sting on his punches. It was a shoeshine job and you don't have to post pictures of Joe's face after the fight to prove your point because it makes no sense. Except for the right hand in the second round, Ali's punches were hardly dangerous. He was throwing shots for the judges scores, nothing more. Certainly he didn't have the conviction in his punches like he did against Frazier in the 14th round of Manilla or any other round in 1975. Very few punches that Ali threw in the FOTC II can compare with the murderess yet desperate intentions he had in Manilla. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|