Paul Williams vs Davey Moore @ 154

[Xplosive]

Who wins?

[MAG1965]

Paul Williams. He was more proven than Davey Moore. 11 fights for Davey Moore and I think he won the title with 8 fights. That is not enough fights to be champion in any era.

[Xplosive]

Originally Posted by MAG1965

Paul Williams. He was more proven than Davey Moore. 11 fights for Davey Moore and I think he won the title with 8 fights. That is not enough fights to be champion in any era.

Davey Moore beat the Hell outta Kaule, who had previously only lost to Leonard. Kaule was a lot better than Carlos Quitana, a fighter that Moore would have never lost to.

[MAG1965]

Originally Posted by Xplosive

Davey Moore beat the Hell outta Kaule, who had previously only lost to Leonard. Kaule was a lot better than Carlos Quitana, a fighter that Moore would have never lost to.

well yeah. I would think he could beat someone good , but when a fight gets tough he does not have the experience, and even a guy with 30 fights would have a big experience level over him.Duran had near 80 fights.

[Xplosive]

Originally Posted by MAG1965

well yeah. I would think he could beat someone good , but when a fight gets tough he does not have the experience, and even a guy with 30 fights would have a big experience level over him.Duran had near 80 fights.

Duran was one of the greatest fighters to ever draw breath.

What was Paul Williams?

[MAG1965]

Originally Posted by Xplosive

Duran was one of the greatest fighters to ever draw breath.

What was Paul Williams?

a decent fighter who could hang with guys like Margarito and Martinez. I see Williams extending the fight and stopping Davey. I am not saying Paul was the same level as Roberto, but he was big and had a good punch and a decent chin. He could take Moore into the later rounds and stop him. Buster Drayton beat Davey and stopped him.

[lora]

An on form Drayton was twice the fighter Williams was and Moore was never quite as assured after the Duran loss.

Great underrated fight that was, though.

Williams is a lanky volume punching punchbag.He'd be lucky to be many of the 2nd tier 154 fighters of the 80s.

[Flea Man]

Originally Posted by MAG1965

Paul Williams. He was more proven than Davey Moore. 11 fights for Davey Moore and I think he won the title with 8 fights. That is not enough fights to be champion in any era.

You keep saying that.

Muangsurin and Sahaprom say you're horrifically wrong.

Moore faced a few top ten guys. It's bullshit that you keep saying this.

[Flea Man]

Originally Posted by MAG1965

well yeah. I would think he could beat someone good , but when a fight gets tough he does not have the experience, and even a guy with 30 fights would have a big experience level over him.Duran had near 80 fights.

Have you seen the fight with Kalule? He was in there with Moore all the ****ing way.

Charlie Weir was a tremendous puncher as well.

[Hands of Iron]

MAG's agenda is relentless.

[itrymariti]

I'd expect Williams to get quite badly knocked out

[Flea Man]

Originally Posted by itrymariti

I'd expect Williams to get quite badly knocked out

I'm not sure. Moore was a solid offensive fighter and he'd hit P-Dub fairly regularly, but bar Sergio II Williams always showed a pretty reliable chin. I could see it though.

[NoNeck]

Davey Moore lost to an old-ass Duran, therefore he'd knockout Paul Williams, who barely could barely beat a prime Margarito or Sergio Martinez.

[Flea Man]

Originally Posted by NoNeck

Davey Moore lost to an old-ass Duran, therefore he'd knockout Paul Williams, who barely could barely beat a prime Margarito or Sergio Martinez.

Another window licking post. Do yourself a favour and kill yourself.

[NoNeck]

Originally Posted by Flea Man

Another window licking post. Do yourself a favour and kill yourself.

If you actually were witty, you wouldn't have to use "window-licker" as your fall back 100% of the time. I mean, it's a nice insult, but it's your only one.