|
|
|
#1 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,710
vCash: 1000 |
During the build up to Shane vs Winky in early 2004, there were talks about a possible Trinidad-Mosley showdown....If Shane had either avoided this fight or managed to beat Winky (LOL) what would have happened here. This is not a match up of primes rather a late 04 early 05 match up. Who would win and how?
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,710
vCash: 1000 |
Well since it seems that I am the only one interested in this fight...I would give a clear nod to Shane if this fight takes place at 154. I think at this point (particularly the 3 winky fights) Shane had more tools in place than Tito. I don't know how Shane would fare at 160, but if I were a betting man I would place it ($$$) on Shane there as well!
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,727
vCash: 1000 |
I prefer a prime-prime match up. Either way its an interesting match up, Mosley the quicker better boxer, Trinidad the stalk and kill operator.
I think the thing that suits Trinidad is Mosley's defense can be very open and can let him down. If Trinidad can unload and land counters I would pick him to stop Mosley. On the other hand Mosley beat the Delahoya that everyone had beating Tito. Shouldn't Mosley be able to do the same as Hoya? On the third hand Mosley got caught and countered by Forrest so Tito could do the same more emphatically although Tito isn't as quick/rangy as Forrest I lean towards Tito in both scenarios but I definately have a preferance for Tito anyway so I maybe biased. I think Tito has become underestimated based on his comeback fights which were way past his prime and above optimal weight |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,710
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,727
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Roberto Duran
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 12,401
vCash: 1000 |
Trinidad TKO 10
Unlike Hopkins and Wright, Shane isn't a great defensive fighter. And he couldn't go 12 rounds giving lateral movement and boxing like De La Hoya was able to do. He never had any objections to getting into a slugfest. I see Trinidad landing the harder shots throughout, holding his own from mid-range because he had a more authorative jab, and softening Mosley up for a late stoppage. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Spartan
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: otown
Posts: 1,423
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,710
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
ヒップホップ·プロデューサー
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 黒人文化の恋人のサンプリ
Posts: 18,789
vCash: 1500 |
i think mosley could out hustle him trinidad always kept behind the gaurd and somtimes got stuck behind it when peopel throw combo's. a main reaosn why de la hoya was so effective.
shane isnt good defencivly very talented but he will take shots to land...very rare from an elite amatuer and considered the next roy jones. but point is he isnt worried about taking shots so he will be aggresive enough to overcome the taller fighter. im seeing a more of a workrate win by mosley. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|