|
|
|
#1 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,590
vCash: 500 |
who would you rate higher in a h2h sense. In other words... which fighter would be better at beating a variety of styles.
Next question... if they fought 3 matches.. while both in their primes.. how do you see the series going? |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,045
vCash: 1000 |
Hard to say.
Conn had by far the better precocious resume, but Tunney had the better run at their respective peaks. Tunney was bigger, and likley better head to head, but Conn was better p4p. Head to head, I might turn conventional wisdom on its head and pick Conn. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,514
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Eh, gotta disagree with you there, 'Doza. Conn fought many more big punchers than Tunney. His chin was tested much more severely than Gene's and as such, you must give him the durability nod. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|