|
|
|
#2 |
|
Amateur
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 17,650
vCash: 75 |
I simply have to disagree. The first for JMM by one or two, the second also for JMM by one or two, and the third for JMM by at least 3
EDIT: Kellerman had the 2nd for JMM by a point, which is accurate. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Amateur
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 17,650
vCash: 75 |
I like Kellerman's analysis though...each guy focusing on what they do best makes for a better fight and maybe a more decisive outcome.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LosAngeles
Posts: 11,457
vCash: 75 |
Kellerman now a full time HBO analyst, had to jump aboard the HBO fighter hype train or be relieved of his duties, thats why he scored what most fight fans thought was the clearest decision for Marquez a draw on Kellerman's card.
You could sense during the 3rd fight broadcast that it pained Kellerman to follow Lampley's lead, but it was either that or lose his job. ![]() Kellerman has always been one to pay attention and score clean effective punching, but he did'tn follow that pattern of scoring in the third Marquez-Pacquiao fight. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
ESB Legend
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Follow my blog, Boxing Legends on Facebook for the most up to date boxing news!
Posts: 9,253
vCash: 171 |
Nah, I can see the first and second for either but third was more clear due to the fact Marquez never hit the deck.
In terms of rounds it is around 8-4 for Marquez in most but the first and seconds knockdowns gave Pac a shot, he didn't have that in the third |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,082
vCash: 1360 |
You see, in the last few years Kellerman has turned into a company man.. That last fight was the clearest JMM, but he had to go with HBO policy and act like the Pac win was not a travesty...
He probably had pac beating Bradley by 119-109 too. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,088
vCash: 75 |
1st and 2nd was Pac's, 3rd for JMM.
No matter how many times I watch it, I got the above results as the most consistent. You can make a case for either of them winning in all their fights, except for the 3rd wherein the best you can give Pac is a draw. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,276
vCash: 1000 |
I thought Manny edged the first. Draw on the second one and maybe even the third.
That being said, fights were ridiculously close enough to have their scores switching either way. Don't be fooled though, fourth fight will be no different but I think Marquez have a good chance to finally pull it through clearly this time. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Broner 24-2
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Durham/Essex, England
Posts: 2,059
vCash: 300 |
1st fight: Marquez
2nd fight: Pacquiao by one point. 3rd fight: Draw. 4th fight: Marquez is being told to weigh 147lbs, what a complete joke. It doesn't help his case that he's 39 years old! I have Pacquiao winning this one 117-111. Unfortunately. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
the Pacific Storm
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Marikina, PI
Posts: 2,291
vCash: 669 |
I had the first 2 fights by 1 point for pac.. I had the third fight for jmm by a clear 3-4 points
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,320
vCash: 1300 |
I scored the first a draw ( scored 1 round even), second fight to Manny knock down point being the difference and the 3rd fight to Marquez.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|