|
|
|
#137 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 835
vCash: 500 |
Then DANNY williams is better then LL because right after the LL fight williams koed mike in only half the time it took LL ??? ect ect ect . In boxing that isn't even a point .
I hope this helps you . PS You also might want to check out who KOed SHANNON BRIGGS faster then LL also . lol
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,514
vCash: 505 |
Tyson had ruptured one of his cruciate ligmaments in the Williams fight. It's hard enough to stand with that injury, let alone fight. If anything Tyson should get credit for carrying on when lesser fighters quit with shoulder injuries.
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 835
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
. You characters are making assclowns of yourselves trying to make the KLITS look bad . Its really pathetic .
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,514
vCash: 505 |
And people saying that were wrong, but it has absolutely nothing to with people saying the same about Wlad, because it's very true in his case. The second half of Lewis' career was mostly a succession of former world champs, ATGS, Hall of famers and the main man from the successive era. Wlad doesn't have that excuse.
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winnipeg... white whit north
Posts: 428
vCash: 387 |
I am a hugh klitschko Fan but Lennox's resume trumps Wlad's at this point... however If Wlad does beat a few top guys who go to rule the division in future years things could change. Lenox had the chance to fight guys who were considered Great by the time he fought them... Wlad didn't have the same chance. Just guesstimating here but if you pool the oponenets from both resumes then the best 2-3 wins belong to Lennox. Ultimatly it depends how you rate Wlad's opponenets, personally i think byrd would beat holyfield (styles make fights) but holyfield has acocomplished more at heavyweight and is a better name. Tyson is a great name but at the time he fought lennox he probobly wasn't even top 10 heavyweight. Vitaly is a great win for Lennox... outside of those 3 names all other opponenets are similar for both resumes.
|
|
|
|
#144 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,043
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
![]() There lies the fallacy of your argument. When Lennox demolished Vitali nobody thought it was a meaningful win for his resume. Now - 10 years later - it looks like one of his best wins altogether. |
|
|
|
|
#145 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,514
vCash: 505 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#147 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,514
vCash: 505 |
No, the fallacy would be if your argument is that Wlad's opponents will all go on to be ATGs, world champs and Hall of Famers, despite their being no evidence to back that up, and Lewis beat most of his opponents when they had already had succesful careers or were being thought of as Hall of Famers. The win over Vitali doesn't add much to his legacy (although it is one of his best wins in hindsight), he was already a certain ATG at that point and he would never get near Ali and Louis.
|
|
|
|
#149 | ||
|
THE Anti-Nutthugger
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Murrika
Posts: 357
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
He made his name by completely walking thru, in short time, opponents that were previously highly regarded (Ruddock, Golota, Grant etc.). Not by boxing with "hesitancy" & cautioness and stinking out the joint in his biggest showcases. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
#150 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,514
vCash: 505 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|