Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum Lounge European British Aussie MMA Classic Training
Go Back   East Side Boxing Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

 
  


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2012, 10:31 AM   #1
roversbowers
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: bristol, england
Posts: 1,506
vCash: 2844
Default Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Theres lots of talk about Cleverley fighting Hopkins and Frcoh rematching kessler or ward but surely this fight makes sense. Both British, Both World champions, both recognised in the USA, Light Heavyweight champ v Super Middleweight champion.

any thoughts?
roversbowers is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-18-2012, 10:36 AM   #2
SWAGGER
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: south london (lewisham borough)
Posts: 395
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Yes good fight froch would beat clev though i want froch to take care of kessler 1st though then adonis steveson the pimp then cleverly then degale. after possibly groves then retire no need for bute thats bullying and wards just to skilled and slick so just leave that 1 alone.
SWAGGER is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 10:38 AM   #3
*BOX_FAN*
GrzegorzProksa 29(21)-2-0
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 750
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Prefer Kessler vs Froch II and Fonfara vs Cleverly.
*BOX_FAN* is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 10:44 AM   #4
Tyler-Durden
P4P Numero Uno
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Karabagh
Posts: 12,293
vCash: 75
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SWAGGER View Post
Yes good fight froch would beat clev though i want froch to take care of kessler 1st though then adonis steveson the pimp then cleverly then degale. after possibly groves then retire no need for bute thats bullying and wards just to skilled and slick so just leave that 1 alone.
Degale is a waste of time too if you ask me. He should take another top-ranked LHW instead, like Chad Dawson.

So basically : Kessler II, Stevenson, Groves, Cleverly, Dawson.
Tyler-Durden is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 10:46 AM   #5
ashishwarrior
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,185
vCash: 0
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

froch should not put a penny in f wanks pocket , he could do a khan and say unless you leave f wank there is no fight
ashishwarrior is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 10:47 AM   #6
timeout
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,511
vCash: 75
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Would love to see this great British scrap !
timeout is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 10:54 AM   #7
Kingkazim
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,096
vCash: 75
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Kessler should be the priority, if not, I welcome a LHW scrap for the title.
Kingkazim is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 10:54 AM   #8
Box84
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 227
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

I'm tempted to say yes but I think Froch should stay at 168.....so no.
Box84 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 10:56 AM   #9
Fellonblackdays
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,798
vCash: 462
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

I want to see him rematch Kessler as we all know he wants to.
Fellonblackdays is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 11:14 AM   #10
elninochino
Cutman
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Birmingham - UK
Posts: 418
vCash: 500
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Rather see Froch fight Bute, Kessler then ward. He'd ko clev within 8, so unless clev does something special in his next fight or two, he doesn't deserve a Froch fight. Paper champ.
elninochino is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 11:22 AM   #11
Boxalot
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 997
vCash: 500
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Froch is only 171/172 on fight night, he's too small for 175. He'd kill Cleverly though.

Focus on 168, there's plenty of fights there. Kessler II would be next in an ideal world.
Boxalot is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 11:24 AM   #12
hellsbells
nihil sub sole novum
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,276
vCash: 0
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Cleverly would be destroyed.
hellsbells is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 11:47 AM   #13
BoxingObserver
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 214
vCash: 500
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

@timeout your avatar pic what fight was that when they met?
BoxingObserver is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 12:14 PM   #14
MaliBua
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 7,013
vCash: 500
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Kessler fight and maybe Cleverly. I believe Froch would ROCK Cleverly in same fashion than he did to Bute and Mack.

Froch is ROCKING these guys.
MaliBua is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 12:19 PM   #15
ELECTRIC GURU
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 678
vCash: 500
Default Re: Does anybody wanna see Froch v Cleverley?

Cleverly would butcher Froch in emphatic fashion, Clev is superior in every single department to Froch.
ELECTRIC GURU is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

East Side Boxing Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump








All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013