|
|
|
#3 |
|
Mandanda Running E-Pen
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 13,017
vCash: 500 |
Difference being Bellew had a cutman who could stem the bleeding and it wasn't a crimson tide over his face like Barrera's.
Barrera should of been stopped as soon as it happened IMO. Bellew's was really bad but Mick done a great job. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 744
vCash: 6618 |
If they had have stopped Barrera straight away it would have ruled the fight a no contest, so they waited till round 4 and stopped it so Khan got the win, bloody robbery. I think the bellew cut was as bad but in a slightly differant position, if I remember rightly Barreras was over the full length of his eyebrow where as bellews wasn't. Barrera couldnt see at thing but Bellew could.
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,531
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,315
vCash: 500 |
The Barrera fight was a joke!
It was a terrible cut, and the fight should have been stopped straight away. Afterwards, you'd have though Amir had beaten a prime Barrera, the way he was talking. The guy's a complete clown! He then went on to fight McCloskey, who was frustrating him, and making him miss, and then they stopped the fight, when there wasn't even any blood. An absolute disgrace of a stoppage! Then Khan says "I would definitely have gone on to stop him anyway!" Can't stand the guy, and I can't wait for him to get knocked out again! Regards, Loudon. |
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: manchester
Posts: 352
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|