|
|
|
#2 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 647
vCash: 500 |
No. Those that watched both men fight in their primes say Dempsey was the greater hwt. Langford who fought Wills more than anyone stated that Dempsey was the greatest hwt he had ever seen.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,398
vCash: 500 |
If most people ranked Wills over Dempser, we'd see threads asking : is it feasible to rank Dempsey over Wills ? Probably more often, I'd say. If you don't rate Dempsey highly because he didn't fight Wills, well you can't do much better with Wills.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,398
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
So, my answer is : you can rank Wills higher, but only because it's a boxing forum with enough guys with good knowledge to keep the other guys from throwing tomatoes at you. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 647
vCash: 500 |
Dempsey was one of the greatest fighters ever to live. Arcel rated him right up there with Louis and Ali. Arcel saw all three live from ringside and was one of boxing histories best trainers. Arcel..."what Dempsey had you can't teach."
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Awesomeizationism!
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,990
vCash: 1000 |
I got them both in the range from 10-15, sharing space with Johnson, Wlad, and Liston. I wouldn't argue too much with any ordering of those 5.
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
weird
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The Green Isle
Posts: 13,200
vCash: 82 |
Quote:
"Historians said..." "Ray Arcel said..." "Ringside reporters said..." I'm not saying not to factor their judgement in, as they were experts, but relying only on their word is a bit... I dunno. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 647
vCash: 500 |
I have. Since 1973 when I bought my first 8 mm film of Dempsey I have studied not only him but all past hwt champions. Today with YouTube it makes it much easier. However when you are talking about fighters where film footage is not the best you must heavily consider experts who saw from ringside the fighters in action. expert after expert, trainer after trainer say that Dempsey was a unique and exceptional talent. Arcel was a soft spoken man who would not jump to quick but erroneous conclusions. He was also one of boxings all time trainers. His conclusion was that Dempsey was right there, actually better, than Louis and Ali. To think he was plain wrong and with him men like Langford who also rated Jack as the best would be a huge mistake. These men saw him flesh and blood in his prime....first hand accounts.
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,060
vCash: 1000 |
I have Dempsey over Wills, probably too much so because I think Wills was tailor made for Dempsey... which probably should not factor in as much as it does for me.
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,705
vCash: 1000 |
Well he has a better resume, so feesable, hard to gauge how good he was
Well plenty of the time picked Wills to win and few probably watched Wills. But that's all irrelevant given few challengers are ever favourite over the current champion, including the likes of Clay, Frazier and Foreman |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|