|
|
|
#2 |
|
Journeyman
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 63
vCash: 1000 |
This:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQdg8JSonM0[/ame] The KO would probably be in half the rounds because Broner probably has a little more power and way more aggressive. |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 13,456
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
Ricky's feet are quicker than what Broner has shown me, meaning he will struggle to dictate distance like Mayweather did, who was troubled himself. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,144
vCash: 1000 |
If you saw his last fight, Broner's got that "ring post move" down pat, already.
And those straight rights that Floyd was catching him with... Broner's already better than Ricky ever was. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,320
vCash: 1300 |
Until Broner proves himself to be close to as good as Floyd then you would have to favour Hatton. Just because he has the same style as Floyd doesn't make him as good, and so far we don't know how Broner will cope with a strong pressure fighter with fast feet who likely push him on the back foot. Floyds got better footwork to create distance Broner hasn't shown he can fight of the back foot yet.
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Journeyman
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 63
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
What I will say though, is that Hatton's been in that ring doing the same thing 47 times and lost to the two best fighters in his era, and has only been beaten once at 140. It would've been a killer fight to see, that's for sure. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I Ain't Got No Worries
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 36,336
vCash: 75 |
I favor Hatton only because I haven't seen Broner at 140. With that said if Broner is the same guy he is at 135 that he is at 140 I would pick Broner.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|