|
|
|
#1 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,773
vCash: 500 |
Broner just moved up a division and beat the top guy with ease.
It's laughable that all these people here are complaining. What has Froch done other than lose to Ward, Dirrell and Kessler? Since when do fighters get props for losing? |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,064
vCash: 0 |
Wins over Pascal, Taylor, Dirrel, Abraham, Johnson, Bute shit all over anything Broner has acomplished. No shame in losing to Ward who you can argue is the best fighter in the world at the moment.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,773
vCash: 500 |
Pascal - who had he beaten at that stage
Taylor - shot fighter, who hadn't done anything significant at 168. Also he still schooled Froch for 11 rounds haha. That's like saying Khan should get credit for beating Judah. Dirrell - green fighter... who had he beaten at that stage Johnson - old, ancient fighter Bute - best win was against someone Carl Froch already murdered Abraham - his best win at 168 was over a shot fighter that Carl Froch had already knocked out Who else? Robin Reid - haha! Let's face it, this guy is good but overrated. |
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,120
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
Froch lost to Ward and Kessler, Carl Froch SD12 Andre Dirrell. Plenty of fighters get props for losing when they take on top competition, no one at 160-175 would get close to beating Ward at the minute so no shame in that, and the fight with Kessler was a war. Quote:
Taylor- Beat Jeff Lacy in a WBC eliminator (No big deal I know but still not that bad) Dirrell- Think he proved against Froch that he is very tough to beat. Johnson- Yusaf Mack and Allen Green in his last three bouts. Bute- As much as I think he was protected and felt although Froch would win that bout he was far from favorite and Bute was regarded as #2 in the division. Abraham- Was still regarded as a power puncher, made Dirrell visit Dr.Shawhi Stop twisting shit to fit your agenda, the most legit thing you could have posted is that a two division champion should be ranked above a one division champion, however to say that you would have to rate Ricky Burns as high as Broner, now if you think they deserve to be rated the same fair enough Broner > Froch, however if you are going to say Broner > Burns the only way you can do that is by saying Broner has fought a higher standard of competition which would therefore make Froch > Broner. |
||
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington State, USA
Posts: 9,229
vCash: 150 |
W Bute
W Pascal W Abraham W Johnson W Taylor W Magee W Mack W Dirrell L Ward L Kessler OR W DeMarco W Litzau W Escobedo W Perez W Rodriguez W Ponce de Leon You tell me which set of career fights is worthy of higher ranking. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|