|
|
|
#1 |
|
March 8th, 1971
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland
Posts: 9,633
vCash: 238 |
Axel Schulz should've been linear heavyweight champion but was denied the decision against an old Foreman. If he won, he'd probably be listed as one of the weakest champions. So how do you think he'd do against Neon Leon?
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,229
vCash: 576 |
I'd imagine this would end with Spinks winning a firm decision. Schulz is neither powerful enough (in the way Coetzee or Holmes were) to KO Spinks, nor is he busy enough (as LeDoux or even a shot Ali were) to outwork him.
This would be the conflict between the ultra-stiff boxer and the relentless unorthodox swarmer. Spinks was very mediocre, but at his best he had considerable energy and a very awkward style. If Botha can work his way to a clear decision, then Spinks (who wasn't bodgy and actually had some idea of defense) can win a wide decision. Last edited by AmazingHook; 10-04-2006 at 03:09 PM. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,413
vCash: 1000 |
As wacky as Leon Spinks career was, he still managed to beat at least three decent fighters in his short time at the top.Leon Spinks decisions Axel Schlulz by unanimous decison in 12.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|