|
|
|
#2 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Flint
Posts: 13,165
vCash: 4047 |
from what i hear the hiltons weren't exactly top flight..they was kinda pushed.. but mayorga now he whooped the man who beat the man .. he was technically or he should have been rather..the pound for pound best in the world after beating forrest ...
he'd be way to skilled if you can imagein .. even if its in his own right .. for matt hilton |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,743
vCash: 1000 |
Matthew Hilton was a better fight than Mayorga and a little bigger man. He would've got inside Mayorga's wild punches (and taken some for sure), but would do the better work on the inside and stopped Matorga late.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,403
vCash: 1000 |
Hilton had a vicious hook andwould have taken Mayorgas head off in the 5th round.One thing you didn't want to do was stand in front of Matthew-he was a very powerful jr.midlle.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Journeyman
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 60
vCash: 500 |
Okay so Hilton in his early 1987 prime v the mayorga of 2003 vintage.
I think Mayorga demolishes Hilton in 5 or 6 in a barnburning slugfest. Hilton would quit on his stool, mauled, and broken. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|