|
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What is your opinion of the officiall scoring of Mayweather/Cotto? | |||
| The Judges got it right |
|
41 | 45.05% |
| It was too onesided in Mayweather's favor |
|
32 | 35.16% |
| It wasn't as close as the judges scored it |
|
9 | 9.89% |
| Draw |
|
4 | 4.40% |
| Cotto should have gotten the decision |
|
5 | 5.49% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#76 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LosAngeles
Posts: 11,246
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
Throwing past 3 punches means you stay in a vicintiy and or spot for to long. That gives the other guy the counter opportunity. Thats the reason why Marquez got stunned a couple of times in fight 2. In fight 3, Marquez there were less instances of Marquez throwing past 3 punches at a times. There were some,but they were much less frequent than fight 2. It was by design. The gameplan was not to give Pacquiao the chance to land that big shot counter that would send Marquez down. The result was Pacquiao did'nt have the chance as much as to even stun Marquez, much less hurt him. Mayweather rarely gets stunned because he rarely throws past 3 punches in a row, which was the tweak Marquez made to his plan not to get planted on the canvas. It worked! Unfortunately as Bob Arum stated, "Juan, this is a business!" |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
Still Slick! Still Black!
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: G Rap
Posts: 13,404
vCash: 571 |
Quote:
I mean what rounds are you giving Cotto. 1? 2? 4? 5? 7? 10? 11? or 12? This are pretty clear Floyd rounds. So that leaves 3 and 9 as the close conceivably Cotto rounds. Ok you score all for Cotto 8-4. So I don't see how you can criticize the judges. He'll Harold Letterman gave the fifth to Cotto. Cotto slapped Floyd on ass after the round cuz he knows he got outclassed that round. So I don't see he bias |
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 878
vCash: 400 |
Quote:
![]() What are you arguing about I had it 8-4 for Floyd as well. Bob Sheridan who I was saying was biased was doing commentary he wasn't one of the judges. |
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LosAngeles
Posts: 11,246
vCash: 75 |
Quote:
When you open up like that, the opponent if he's pretty good, gets his chance to land his. Now I ask? Why did Mayweather commit for to his shots and punch more in combination against Cotto than he did Marquez????? My answer is that Mayweather did'nt respect Cotto's ability to counter him, thus he felt more secure opening up vs Cotto than he did against Marquez which countering and thinking ability Mayweather respects. |
|
|
|
|
#81 | |
|
Still Slick! Still Black!
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: G Rap
Posts: 13,404
vCash: 571 |
Quote:
Also why I think Cotto outboxing Floyd that round is a little overrated. Floyd was a wee bit cloudy that round |
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Still Slick! Still Black!
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: G Rap
Posts: 13,404
vCash: 571 |
Well to sum it up I thought 2 of the judges were on the money. With 1 being a little biased. But not overwhelmingly so.
|
|
|
|
#85 | |
|
ESB Official Gif Poster
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,369
vCash: 920 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
newbie
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 42
vCash: 500 |
I scored it 6 rounds to 4 for Cotto with 2 rounds even. one thing is for sure: Floyd didnt win this fight. and anybody who believes the biased, ridiculous commentary, doesnt care about the truth. Cotto won. Floyd knows it. I know it. Cotto knows it.
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: "Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it."
Posts: 9,989
vCash: 845 |
I said in my op that I would not argue with any decision. I do have a question though. Some of you who had close score cards. Said something about finding rounds to give to Cotto. My question is why? Just beacuse one guy is doing good dose not mean the other guy is doing better. If boxer A. is doing better in each round than Boxer B. Shouldn't Boxer A. Get the round, no matter how well Boxer B. Might have done?
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|