|
|
|
#7 |
|
Undetectable
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,945
vCash: 500 |
Not to mention the fact that JMM went down 4 times and wasn't ever broken. I think that says more about JMM than it does about Pac. You can get lucky and land a perfect shot but you can't teach or ever put a price on the will to survive and fight back. Not to take anything away from Pac's abilities; I just think Marquez's resiliency is more impressive than the knockdowns. Nobody ever gives JMM enough credit for it.
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
newbie
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 28
vCash: 500 |
Visual perspective is crucial in close rounds. This trilogy is exciting to me cause i might give to different fighters at different times.
Both are highly skilled professionals so im fine just enjoying the fight itself. For the rec, i give marquez fights 1 and 3 and pac fight 2. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8,488
vCash: 1000 |
But some rounds ware like 10:7 10:8 for PAC which if you score
by points it should be officially more like a draw, at least half of the rounds were very close and a personal taste (not based on real boxing knowledge) is important in scoring to left or to right. My personal taste is that a more offensive than defensive fighter should win, hence PAC pressing and initiating the attack is better than Maruez' passive/counter punching style which more destroys action than initiate anything. I think most judges see this the same way, that is why PAC is officially a clear winner. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|