|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,515
vCash: 962 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 16,145
vCash: 10918 |
boxing trainers know about boxing strategy, they don't know about what is best for getting the peak out of the human body.
They can talk about the old methods all they like, but at the end of the day we have more knowledge and have progressed from old methods for a reason. |
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 185
vCash: 500 |
No Trout was the problem. A bigger JMW who was fast and showed good foot work against Cotto who's only shot of winning was pinning him against the ropes. Stop making excuses, that night Trout was the better man and honestly if Cotto trained at lower altitude or what ever I'm sure the fight would have been similar.
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,127
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Peak out of the human body ,listen if it was a health thing I would not argue but from a boxing perspective , I have yet to see how these progressions have improved the fighters in the ring ..Sure they are healthy as hell but when they can't box for a full fight with skill it hurts the fighters in the long run .Has anyone noticed how Cotto always gasses in his fights ? How was his physical peak an advantage when he almost get the breaks beat off him in the boxing matches down the stretch ? |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 901
vCash: 500 |
Truth is... Cotto was a chubby kid. He took up boxing to shed pounds and so.. he is not necessarily a blessed athlete in terms of his genetics. At the core is that chubby little kid who gasses out. He made the most of it and the reality is.. He has gotten older. Cotto to me was beastly at 140...those body shots back then were thrown with fury.
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Still Slick! Still Black!
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: G Rap
Posts: 13,404
vCash: 571 |
Altitude training doesnt help. Your body immediately adjusts back to your natural levels almost immediately. Its shy athletes blood dope instead.
It is great if you want to lose weight though. When I first move to the mountains i dropped weight like crazy until i acclimated how is that good for a boxer? |
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 205
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 869
vCash: 585 |
High altitude training never really made sense to me. I think it prevents you from reaching normal thresholds necessary to peak in training. Depriving your body of oxygen doesn't seem like a good idea. I understand high altitude training "in theory" train up in thin air so when you come down you can breath twice as easily but then again communism works "in theory" I think the isolation of being up in the mountains free from distraction is what truly benefits fighters.
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,446
vCash: 500 |
Altitude training is used to increase red blood cell production in the muscles. That is a peripheral adaptation, your fitness isn't increased just the holding capacity of the muscles for oxygen. It doesn't take long for those changes to disappear at sea level. When you train at high altitude you cannot train at a high intensity like at sea level.
High intensity training is what increases central adaptations i.e. Vo2 max. That's the reason for the train low-sleep high method, you gain the central adaptations from the high intensity training plus the peripheral adaptations from the altitude. The peripheral gains from altitude are far more pronounced for pure endurance athletes such as long distance cyclists and runners. For a hybrid athlete like a boxer it would make minimal difference. The important fitness gains are central, the Vo2 max and Lactic capacity from high intensity training. If a boxer spends his whole training camp at altitude he will be impaired unless he was already in peak condition before camp, the boxer would then detrain during camp but if he was already at a high level of central fitness it might not matter too much. Either way altitude training is next to useless for a boxer imo, and as I mentioned more often than not detrimental to performance. |
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 15,127
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 16,145
vCash: 10918 |
Quote:
You want to know why Cotto gassed heavily? Trout was landing heavy Left hands to his body along with stiff jabs to his body all through the fight. You could see the cummulative effects as the fight progressed and the apex was when Trout hit him in the body with his left that hurt Cotto and made him turn around and run to the corner. That was all Trout, not his conditioning. |
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 131
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 177
vCash: 1000 |
High altitude training is overrated as is much of the fancy training boxers do today. If you want good boxing endurance and to be strong in the ring, put in more rounds sparring and hitting the mitts one right after the other and run at least four days a week and do ab work and push ups or lift medium heavy weights. That's really all you need.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|