Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2012, 06:30 AM   #106
dinovelvet
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,726
vCash: 100
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by madballster View Post
Makes you wonder how an ancient Larry Holmes and Frank f'kin Bruno landed jabs on Tyson
Holmes knocked people down with his jab and had such force and snap he could win a whole fight behind it. It didn't stop Mike from Knoking him out in 4 and Wlad has a massively inferior jab to Holmes.
dinovelvet is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-06-2012, 06:32 AM   #107
itsa huge bitch
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: in my house
Posts: 5,640
vCash: 762
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinovelvet View Post
Holmes knocked people down with his jab and had such force and snap he could win a whole fight behind it. It didn't stop Mike from Knoking him out in 4 and Wlad has a massively inferior jab to Holmes.
holmes came out of retirement ffs..take a redner..

and on top of it..holmes era was shit..

tyson beating holmes was like iggy beat holyfield..FACT
itsa huge bitch is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 06:36 AM   #108
dinovelvet
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,726
vCash: 100
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsa huge bitch View Post
holmes came out of retirement ffs..take a redner..

and on top of it..holmes era was shit..

tyson beating holmes was like iggy beat holyfield..FACT
Holmes beat prime Mercer after that. Years later 35 unfit Mercer gave Lewis a very close fight. Holmes also went the distance with Holyfield.
dinovelvet is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 07:05 AM   #109
itsa huge bitch
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: in my house
Posts: 5,640
vCash: 762
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinovelvet View Post
Holmes beat prime Mercer after that. Years later 35 unfit Mercer gave Lewis a very close fight. Holmes also went the distance with Holyfield.
and??more triangle theorys ffs..

holmes came out of retirement and got into the ring with tyson..its as simple as that.tyson himself said that he waited about for holmes to get old..and gave the same advice to haye regarding the k bros..

mercer wasnt a great boxer just a tough s.o.b who if you let him would drag you to places you didnt want to go..

how did holmes - holy pan out tho..regardless that he went the ****ing distance with a cw...that same cw who beat tysons ass..so does that mean tyson would beat holyfield cause he knocked out holmes but holmes went the distance with holy.oh wait my head hurts..****ing triangle theorys dont work in boxing..because styles do make fights..but real good boxers find out ways to get through the test even tho they find it tougher than someone else does...
itsa huge bitch is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 07:16 AM   #110
dinovelvet
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,726
vCash: 100
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsa huge bitch View Post
and??more triangle theorys ffs..

holmes came out of retirement and got into the ring with tyson..its as simple as that.tyson himself said that he waited about for holmes to get old..and gave the same advice to haye regarding the k bros..

mercer wasnt a great boxer just a tough s.o.b who if you let him would drag you to places you didnt want to go..

how did holmes - holy pan out tho..regardless that he went the ****ing distance with a cw...that same cw who beat tysons ass..so does that mean tyson would beat holyfield cause he knocked out holmes but holmes went the distance with holy.oh wait my head hurts..****ing triangle theorys dont work in boxing..because styles do make fights..but real good boxers find out ways to get through the test even tho they find it tougher than someone else does...
Im not talking any triangle theorys.

Holmes was still good enough to win over 20 fights after Tyson, beat prime Mercer and go the distance with Hoyfield who was undefeated and on a massive knockout streak.
dinovelvet is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 07:49 AM   #111
itsa huge bitch
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: in my house
Posts: 5,640
vCash: 762
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinovelvet View Post
Im not talking any triangle theorys.

Holmes was still good enough to win over 20 fights after Tyson, beat prime Mercer and go the distance with Hoyfield who was undefeated and on a massive knockout streak.
triangle theory is exactly what your talking about....


80s and 90s are great eras yet a fat george foreman wins a trinket lol... no problem..

tyson is a great boxer...no question..but he is no mythical beats who walks through prime atg superheavyweights...
itsa huge bitch is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 07:53 AM   #112
madballster
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 10,765
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinovelvet View Post
Holmes knocked people down with his jab and had such force and snap he could win a whole fight behind it. It didn't stop Mike from Knoking him out in 4 and Wlad has a massively inferior jab to Holmes.
LOL man you're clueless. Do you even know how fat and shot the version of Holmes was that Mike fought? And that ancient, retired and fat version Holmes still landed dozens and dozens of jabs on a prime Tyson. How's that possible?

You can say what you want about Tyson knocking Wlad out, fine. But argueing Wlad won't land jabs on Tyson because he's 'too elusive' to be jabbed just doesn't hold up to the evidence.
madballster is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 08:19 AM   #113
woodzo
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 321
vCash: 500
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dai View Post
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Now you tell me, how is stiff, 6'6" wlad going to land his jab on that?

This ain't no Sam Peter type shit we are talking about here.

Mike would bob and weave through that shit like it's nothing, and once his inside, you know what time it is?

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
that uppercut is a thing of beauty,


it was far from prime holmes when tyson got to grips to him but after it he went on a 6 or 7 fight win streak or something and was fighting for the lineal title so i dont think he was as shot as shit as everyone makes out

anyway holmes only lost cos he got his arm stuck in the rope...apparently larry was jus waitin for tyson to finish his combo so he could counter and tee off a beautfil counter hook, true story well according to holmes on ESPN, suppose the 2 knock downs before it all the jelly legs after gettin beatin round the ring were 'all part of the plan' as well haha

that been said tyson TKO 6 ...(or less)

Last edited by woodzo; 12-06-2012 at 08:53 AM.
woodzo is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 09:02 AM   #114
banny
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 709
vCash: 500
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by ****out Spastic View Post
I love trannies, me so horny
Seen as you have a fascination for trannies i found 3 stunners for you

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
banny is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 09:33 AM   #115
theboss
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 960
vCash: 500
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinovelvet View Post
Holmes knocked people down with his jab and had such force and snap he could win a whole fight behind it. It didn't stop Mike from Knoking him out in 4 and Wlad has a massively inferior jab to Holmes.
wow .comparing LARRYs power to VLADS just adds more comic stupidity to this already stupidity riden thread . These ROSE CLORED GLASSES that we're looking through show only the beaty but hide all the truth . Oh the highlite real croud is truly something . lol
theboss is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 09:51 AM   #116
dinovelvet
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,726
vCash: 100
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Where did i claim Holmes was more powerful than Wlad ?One post from you is enough to tell me you're authentically stupid. Stay away from me idiot.
dinovelvet is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 09:54 AM   #117
dyna
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,363
vCash: 1551
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinovelvet View Post
Where did i claim Holmes was more powerful than Wlad ?One post from you is enough to tell me you're authentically stupid. Stay away from me idiot.
By saying `massively inferior'.

You're basically implying it.
dyna is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 09:59 AM   #118
dinovelvet
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,726
vCash: 100
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna View Post
By saying `massively inferior'.

You're basically implying it.
Massively inferior jab you ****ing fool.
dinovelvet is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 10:20 AM   #119
knockout artist
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,422
vCash: 2666
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Tyson's win over Holmes means very little. Anyone arguing otherwise is a fool. If he beat a 1981 prime Larry Holmes that would have been an amazing achievement. Beating the fat old coming out of retirement for a payday Holmes doesn't mean you beat an ATG

dino - Holmes jab may be better than Wlad's, but there isn't much between them. Wlad's jab is certainly not 'massively inferior'.
knockout artist is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 10:32 AM   #120
dinovelvet
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,726
vCash: 100
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyLuke View Post
Holmes?
How old was Holmes when he fought Tyson? 60?

Still i think Tyson would win in a late ko. Wladimir has problems to hit small and fast fighters clear.
38. Not much older than Wlad is now.
dinovelvet is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013