Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2012, 10:37 AM   #121
dinovelvet
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,541
vCash: 86
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by knockout artist View Post
Tyson's win over Holmes means very little. Anyone arguing otherwise is a fool. If he beat a 1981 prime Larry Holmes that would have been an amazing achievement. Beating the fat old coming out of retirement for a payday Holmes doesn't mean you beat an ATG

dino - Holmes jab may be better than Wlad's, but there isn't much between them. Wlad's jab is certainly not 'massively inferior'.
That hilarious coming from a Calzaghe nuthugger.

Wlad uses his jab like he's knocking on the door.
dinovelvet is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-06-2012, 10:43 AM   #122
MrMagic
Super Six
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 19,767
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Tyson would rape Wladimir.

Tyson-Vitali is where its at, Wladimir wouldn't last 5 rounds.
MrMagic is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 10:45 AM   #123
T.S.
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oakland/San Francisco
Posts: 2,725
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

I don't know who would win this fantasy matchup that can never be proven but "Bonecrusher" Smith can go the distance with prime Mike Tyson and Wlad Klitschko couldn't?
T.S. is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 11:01 AM   #124
dinovelvet
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 9,541
vCash: 86
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by knockout artist View Post
Tyson's win over Holmes means very little. Anyone arguing otherwise is a fool. If he beat a 1981 prime Larry Holmes that would have been an amazing achievement. Beating the fat old coming out of retirement for a payday Holmes doesn't mean you beat an ATG

dino - Holmes jab may be better than Wlad's, but there isn't much between them. Wlad's jab is certainly not 'massively inferior'.
If you dont rate Tysons win over Holmes you're a hater, its as simple as that. Out of everybody Holmes fought he said he would never fight Tyson again.
4 years after Tyson, Holmes beat Mercer, an undefeated , olympic gold medalist who had just ko'd undefeated Tommy Morrison. Holyfield was ko'ing fighters left right and centre but had trouble with Holmes over 12 rounds.
He was just one point short of beating MaCall who had just knocked out Lewis in 2 rounds, 7 years after the Tyson fight.
To say Mike's win is not an accomplishment is just plain stupid and ignorant.
dinovelvet is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 11:09 AM   #125
itsa huge bitch
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: in my house
Posts: 5,640
vCash: 762
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

tyson = mythical creature who walked through every fighter he fought in his prime ...

duff man oh yeaaaaaaaaaa
itsa huge bitch is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 11:10 AM   #126
itsa huge bitch
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: in my house
Posts: 5,640
vCash: 762
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMagic View Post
Tyson would rape Wladimir.

Tyson-Vitali is where its at, Wladimir wouldn't last 5 rounds.
your from sweden statisticly use ****ers have the smallest cacks in the world..true story
itsa huge bitch is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 12:41 PM   #127
LoRd_inFamousX1
Lord of the Square Rings
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MGM Grand
Posts: 1,803
vCash: 100
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Tyson destroys wlad, it doesn't need any explanations
LoRd_inFamousX1 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 01:00 PM   #128
|A|C|S|
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: London
Posts: 6,492
vCash: 412
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

As a Rios fan it will be hard to watch this will be a brutal fight where Pac will stop him in 5 rounds
Then Pac will rematch Bradley at the end of the year the Floyd fight never gonna happen
|A|C|S| is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 01:06 PM   #129
DrBanzai
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 536
vCash: 75
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by knockout artist View Post
Tyson's win over Holmes means very little. Anyone arguing otherwise is a fool. If he beat a 1981 prime Larry Holmes that would have been an amazing achievement. Beating the fat old coming out of retirement for a payday Holmes doesn't mean you beat an ATG

dino - Holmes jab may be better than Wlad's, but there isn't much between them. Wlad's jab is certainly not 'massively inferior'.
Tyson's win over fat 3 year retired Holmes is Tyson's best win. It's sad that this is all Tyson fans have to try and prove their boy is an ATG....a win over a fat guy who had been retired for 3 years after two losses.
DrBanzai is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 01:14 PM   #130
sean1982
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 380
vCash: 75
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

3 years is an exageration, it was around 19 months, and in that 19 months he had been training, and fought a 15 round exabition match. And he even stated himself he trained hard for tyson a
For 3 months before as the fight had been on the cards for a while.
Its not an awesome win but very very solid considering that tyson demolished him. Something that no one before or after had done.
sean1982 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 01:20 PM   #131
MrMagic
Super Six
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 19,767
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsa huge bitch View Post
your from sweden statisticly use ****ers have the smallest cacks in the world..true story
Uhm..... uh... OK?

Tyson would still make Wladimir look like a confused rape victim, sprawling around in panic, in 3 or 4 rounds max.
MrMagic is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 01:22 PM   #132
itsa huge bitch
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: in my house
Posts: 5,640
vCash: 762
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMagic View Post
Uhm..... uh... OK?

Tyson would still make Wladimir look like a confused rape victim, sprawling around in panic, in 3 or 4 rounds max.
i knew you would like that lol...

that being said in my humble opinion tyson wouldnt stand a chance against mannys version of wlad and his mixture of atributes are the reason why..tyson would be knocked out..it wouldnt even go the distance.unless tyson adapted hayes method to count on defence only then it would go the distance
itsa huge bitch is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 01:27 PM   #133
MrMagic
Super Six
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 19,767
vCash: 1000
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

I'm sure Tyson would "run" from Wladimir
MrMagic is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 02:12 PM   #134
knockout artist
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,422
vCash: 2666
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinovelvet View Post
That hilarious coming from a Calzaghe nuthugger.

This is why no-one takes you seriously

Quote:
Wlad uses his jab like he's knocking on the door.

No he doesn't, he varies it, along with his timing and accuracy that's why he has a great jab.


Quote:
Originally Posted by dinovelvet View Post
If you dont rate Tysons win over Holmes you're a hater, its as simple as that. Out of everybody Holmes fought he said he would never fight Tyson again.
4 years after Tyson, Holmes beat Mercer, an undefeated , olympic gold medalist who had just ko'd undefeated Tommy Morrison. Holyfield was ko'ing fighters left right and centre but had trouble with Holmes over 12 rounds.
He was just one point short of beating MaCall who had just knocked out Lewis in 2 rounds, 7 years after the Tyson fight.
To say Mike's win is not an accomplishment is just plain stupid and ignorant.

It's not really much of an accomplishment though, Holmes was inactive and came into the ring overweight and out of practice. Honestly, someone like David Tua would have destroyed Holmes that night

Holmes was actually better when he was more active, such as when he faced Mercer. I'm no Tyson hater, don't be silly and don't get defensive. I'm just telling it how it is, Tyson's win over Holmes doesn't really mean much, it was no better than his wins over the likes of Tony Tucker and Frank Bruno - solid contenders but far from great. Holyfield was KO'ing which fighters at that time? Holyfield was a great technical boxer, but he wasn't a great puncher. The Holmes that Holyfield fought was better than the one Tyson faced.


Quote:
Originally Posted by itsa huge bitch View Post
i knew you would like that lol...

that being said in my humble opinion tyson wouldnt stand a chance against mannys version of wlad and his mixture of atributes are the reason why..tyson would be knocked out..it wouldnt even go the distance.unless tyson adapted hayes method to count on defence only then it would go the distance

Tyson would have a very good chance against Wlad, 50/50 fight in my opinion
knockout artist is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 02:24 PM   #135
Carrera
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 352
vCash: 500
Default Re: Tyson would have beaten wlad pretty easy and heres why

Tyson in his Prime beats any boxer ever!
Carrera is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013