|
|
|
#1 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,712
vCash: 1000 |
I got this idea from another thread (Duran/Hagler & Napoles/Monzon), and don't know if we have done it before...and frankly i was to lazy to search and see?
Who wins between these two guys @ LW, WW & MW? how/why??? I didn't bother to do a poll, because 80% of people vote but don't explain, discuss or debate....so who ya got? |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 22,218
vCash: 1000 |
Napoles would have been too quick and clever for Duran...and would have made him pay with hurtfull shots. No unnecessary standing and trading like leonard did in Montreal either. He would have outclassed Duran like Benitez did, only, like I said, with more hurt in his punches. Napoles was DeJesus "squared".
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,386
vCash: 1000 |
Even match. Unless Duran can inflict a cut, this one could easily go either way, point-wise. One bout couldn't possibly determine whose better. A trilogy is fitting for this pairing at least.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London,England
Posts: 10,646
vCash: 1000 |
Napoles was the better welterweight,per se,but I can see the 'Montreal' Duran beating Napoles on points. Mantequilla would win any rematches though.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 22,218
vCash: 1000 |
Stevie, I think Napoles would have beaten the Montreal Duran narrowly on points. I don't believe that he would have chosen the wrong syle and approach to fight that version of Duran like Leonard did. Just my opinion. I think Duran would not have been as consumed with hatred as much for Mantequilla as he was for SRL, and would have had more respect for him.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yoknapatawpha
Posts: 2,616
vCash: 475 |
I think the most intriguing fight here is around '74. A just peaking Duran against a very slightly faded Napoles. Duran is moving up, but Napoles is not a huge welter. Great to see if Napoles brilliant punch picking will keep Duran off. I think it will, and he'll take a close, hard decision.
Of course against Montreal Duran, Napoles is exposed as the Cuban Henry Cooper. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Fighting Zapata
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,455
vCash: 500 |
I don't think Napoles is Dejesus squared per se, there's six and half a dozen between them in most respects as boxer-punchers, but the fact that Napoles was a fair bit bigger and thus a more dangerous opponent physically mean it could turn out that way in reality, with the obvious expection that Duran did handle the weight jump when given time.
However a jump straight up to 147 in the early 70s without getting used to things there could well result in that sort of scenario and defeat for Duran. |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 22,218
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,712
vCash: 1000 |
I don't believe that I have ever implied that one before either in this thread or any other! Actually I am a big respecter (Sorry only a Phan of Philly Phighters) of Duran....I do think Napoles would beat Duran by a narrow margin, but on the flip side I rank Duran as greater.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|