Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum Lounge European British Aussie MMA Classic Training
Go Back   East Side Boxing Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

 
  


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-10-2012, 05:10 PM   #106
kirk
Conqueror*Chozen1*Attila*
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ill swallow my Blood before i swallow my Pride
Posts: 29,568
vCash: 75
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Those Pactards over at NY Times

No other way would someone suspect a 40 year old who blows up, looking like his heads gonna pop, with one of the most infamous PED farmers in his camp.

Disgraceful that anyone would even wonder.
kirk is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-10-2012, 05:13 PM   #107
Mamerto
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,703
vCash: 302
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirk View Post
Those Pactards over at NY Times

No other way would someone suspect a 40 year old who blows up, looking like his heads gonna pop, with one of the most infamous PED farmers in his camp.

Disgraceful that anyone would even wonder.
WTF? You are truly a Pactard.
Mamerto is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:15 PM   #108
MattMattMatt
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,740
vCash: 75
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperial1 View Post
It use to be the norm of the previous boxers of the golden age. Look at the fighter Kid Galaxy I think his name was dudes arms were huge ..It was the norm back then but with all these ped's its now a surprise to people ..
The 80s and 90s clearly had a far worse problem with drug use. You would have to be incredibly naive to think that abuse wasn't rampant. You think that it being the norm in an era where testing was even more inadequate is some kind of evidence that modern fighters aren't using?
MattMattMatt is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:15 PM   #109
SweetHome_Bama
The Honorable Judge
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 42,167
vCash: 10918
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scar View Post
If PEDs develop skills and power, almost everyone will have power and supreme skills in this sport. Fact is, Marquez fought as he always did only this time he was clearly looking to hurt Pacquiao with every counter possible. Even in trying that he was actually losing the fight, suffered a concusion, broken nose and cuts. I didn't see anything supernatural or new from Marquez besides his commitment to his punches this time rather than aiming to score rounds/points.
No one said PEDs develop skills but they definitely aid in developing power and stamina.

Marquez fought with more power than he ever had in his career.
His punches in the last fight hurt Manny harder than he was able to ever hurt Manny previously and with the same damn punches and counters. LOL.

Marquez obviously got a tremendous increase in power, why deny it?
SweetHome_Bama is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:16 PM   #110
kirk
Conqueror*Chozen1*Attila*
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ill swallow my Blood before i swallow my Pride
Posts: 29,568
vCash: 75
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mamerto View Post
WTF? You are truly a Pactard.
Not even close.

However, your perception that I am should worry you.... because it means you are so far up JMM's ass that rational thoughts come across as Pactardism. If you cant see that JMM's head and brow have gotten bigger since their first fight, then youre being willfully blind, or simply dont know what youre looking at. Either or.

Thats truth.
kirk is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:16 PM   #111
MattMattMatt
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,740
vCash: 75
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by 'el nino' View Post
I just dont think pacquaio really recovered from the first kd.

Having bigger muscles does not make you punch much harder or take a shot better
No, but I don't think it is out of the question that it could be the physical result of a training regime that your body would not be able to handle without outside assistance.
MattMattMatt is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:17 PM   #112
Imperial1
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16,934
vCash: 1000
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattMattMatt View Post
The 80s and 90s clearly had a far worse problem with drug use. You would have to be incredibly naive to think that abuse wasn't rampant. You think that it being the norm in an era where testing was even more inadequate is some kind of evidence that modern fighters aren't using?

I wouldn't doubt it but one thing was certain they trained a hell of allot harder ..There weren't as many short cuts or drug dealers (strength and conditioning coaches ) as there are today .
Imperial1 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:18 PM   #113
Boxing Fanatic
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 26,737
vCash: 1000
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mamerto View Post
WTF? You are truly a Pactard.
erik morales: "mexicos pharmacy was better"

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Boxing Fanatic is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:21 PM   #114
Scar
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,407
vCash: 372
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetHome_Bama View Post
No one said PEDs develop skills but they definitely aid in developing power and stamina.

Marquez fought with more power than he ever had in his career.
His punches in the last fight hurt Manny harder than he was able to ever hurt Manny previously and with the same damn punches and counters. LOL.

Marquez obviously got a tremendous increase in power, why deny it?
No one is denying anything but power, as previously stated, isn't solely developed through PEDs. What PEDs give are noticeable improvement in stamina, recovery and conditioning. Clearly in this fight Marquez wasn't as fast as he was in the third fight, which is a clear indication that his training this time around was clearly based on power and that took away some speed. Nothing out of the ordinary here and let's face it, this isn't the first time Marquez hurt/rocked Pacquiao, only to a greater extent because of his weight lifting(which explains the bigger muscular shoulders). Marquez, clearly, wanted a knockout in this fight, you could clearly see that this is what he trained for especially when he suffered a broken nose, cuts and broken nose. In all three fights, when did Marquez open up as often as he did in this fight?

PEDs have nothing to do with this, he barely looked supernatural and was actually losing/lost and confused the first two rounds from Pacquiao's head movement. I was far more impressed with Pacquiao's performance, even after the knockout, than Marquez. That's hardly an example of someone on serious PEDs.
Scar is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:21 PM   #115
Imperial1
P4P King
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16,934
vCash: 1000
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxing Fanatic View Post
erik morales: "mexicos pharmacy was better"

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


Imperial1 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:22 PM   #116
mking
Champion
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,060
vCash: 90
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxing Fanatic View Post
erik morales: "mexicos pharmacy was better"

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Morales getting his shots in
mking is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:23 PM   #117
canucks9314
Iron Chinned ATG Warrior
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,133
vCash: 0
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

i don't get it. floyd got ragged on for using similar, bad logic but now the same people who ragged on him are supporting this.
canucks9314 is online now  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:26 PM   #118
janeschicken
hard work! deadicayshin!
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,865
vCash: 1442
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxing Fanatic View Post
erik morales: "mexicos pharmacy was better"

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Mexico : superior pharmacy, inferior meat
janeschicken is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:26 PM   #119
Cut Me Mick
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,505
vCash: 500
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Overload + nutrients = hypertrophy

It really is that simple. Is anybody denying this?
Cut Me Mick is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 05:28 PM   #120
SweetHome_Bama
The Honorable Judge
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 42,167
vCash: 10918
Default Re: NY Times suspicious of Márquez

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scar View Post
No one is denying anything but power, as previously stated, isn't solely developed through PEDs. What PEDs give are noticeable improvement in stamina, recovery and conditioning. Clearly in this fight Marquez wasn't as fast as he was in the third fight, which is a clear indication that his training this time around was clearly based on power and that took away some speed. Nothing out of the ordinary here and let's face it, this isn't the first time Marquez hurt/rocked Pacquiao, only to a greater extent because of his weight lifting(which explains the bigger muscular shoulders). Marquez, clearly, wanted a knockout in this fight, you could clearly see that this is what he trained for especially when he suffered a broken nose, cuts and broken nose. In all three fights, when did Marquez open up as often as he did in this fight?

PEDs have nothing to do with this, he barely looked supernatural and was actually losing/lost and confused the first two rounds from Pacquiao's head movement. I was far more impressed with Pacquiao's performance, even after the knockout, than Marquez. That's hardly an example of someone on serious PEDs.

The power difference came from some where, as did the buliking he did in the 3rd and 4th fight.

It is hard to put on weight while doing cardio, I have no doubt like Manny he was aided in doing so with the help of the PEDs from Angel.

This is the first time Juan ever put Manny down with one clean blow. EVER. He never was able to do that landing the exact same punch before in any of the 3 previous fights. Hell he caught him with the same right hand counter on Manny coming in before and never put him out like that before.

The power came from somewhere, because he never exhibited before and it is my opinion that looking at who he sought out, Angel, it came from him and his specialty, which is designer steroids.

Marquez put on major mass compared to his usual frame, late in life and also developed serous one punch power at 147 in the process, while still retaining stamina to go punch for punch with Manny and not be winded in any way in the 6 rounds they had.

Marquez is clearly a PED user in my opinion and I don't blame him, Manny is on it too.
SweetHome_Bama is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

East Side Boxing Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump








All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
East Side Boxing Forum 2001-2013