How exactly does Pacquiao have a better resume than Mayweather?

[Inquisitive]

Originally Posted by Hatesrats

9 fights Vs. Morales, Barrera & Marquez trump Floyd alone.
Add any if the above after...
*Cotto
*Clottey
*Maragrito
*De La Hoya
*Hatton
Ect...

Majority of fans believe Marquez won at least two, and that's before the KO. Also, Mayweather beat Marquez decisively. The number of times he's faced them is irrelevant. That just means he couldn't seal the deal or lost.

The ones in bold are shared opponents.

Then we have Clottey and Margarito. Mayweather would make mince-meat out of either one. No one puts Clottey in the ranks of the greats, so I don't know why he's considered such a great win for Pacquaio -- oh yeah, he's Pacquaio, that's why.

So that leaves Barrera and Morales.

[Hatesrats]

Originally Posted by Inquisitive

Majority of fans believe Marquez won at least two, and that's before the KO. Also, Mayweather beat Marquez decisively. The number of times he's faced them is irrelevant. Just means he couldn't seal the deal or lost.

The ones in bold are shared opponents.

Then we have Clottey and Margarito. Mayweather would make mince-meat out of either one. No one puts Clottey in the ranks of the greats, so I don't know why he's considered such a great win for Pacquaio -- oh yeah, he's Pacquaio, that's why.

So that leaves Barrera and Morales.

You miss the point IF you only look at wins/losses.
(& you don't understand competition)

[Keitaro2187]

its not better he has some good names on it but mayweather beat del la hoya, hatton, mosely. not to mention he made all a majority of his fights at catch weights so naw his resume isnt that great its just padded.

[Inquisitive]

Originally Posted by Hatesrats

You miss the point IF you only look at wins/losses.
(& you don't understand competition)

Clearly, I don't:

Edmund Enting Ignacio
Pinoy Montejo
Rocky Palma
Dele Decierto
Acasio Simbajon
Armando Rocil
Lolito Laroa
Renato Mendones
Rudolfo Fernandez
Rolando Toyogon
Lito Torrejos
Rustico Torrecampo
Marlon Carillo
John Medina
Bert Batiller
Ippo Gala
Sung-Yul Lee
Mike Luna
Wook-Ki Lee
Ariel Austria
Chokchai Chockvivat
Melvin Magramo
Panomdej Ohyuthanakorn
Shin Terao
Chatchai Sasakul
Todd Makelim
Gabriel Mira
Medgoen Singsurat
Reynante Jamili
Arnel Barotillo
Seung-Kon Chae
Nedal Hussein
Tetsutora Senrima

....

Clearly.

[MichiganWarrior]

Mayweather will be known as the greater fighter. If Pacquiao doesnt retire he'll end up on the canvas atleast a few more times

[Hatesrats]

Originally Posted by Inquisitive

Clearly, I don't:

Edmund Enting Ignacio
Pinoy Montejo
Rocky Palma
Dele Decierto
Acasio Simbajon
Armando Rocil
Lolito Laroa
Renato Mendones
Rudolfo Fernandez
Rolando Toyogon
Lito Torrejos
Rustico Torrecampo
Marlon Carillo
John Medina
Bert Batiller
Ippo Gala
Sung-Yul Lee
Mike Luna
Wook-Ki Lee
Ariel Austria
Chokchai Chockvivat
Melvin Magramo
Panomdej Ohyuthanakorn
Shin Terao
Chatchai Sasakul
Todd Makelim
Gabriel Mira
Medgoen Singsurat
Reynante Jamili
Arnel Barotillo
Seung-Kon Chae
Nedal Hussein
Tetsutora Senrima

....

Clearly.

It's all good ALT...
I'm not here to argue apples & oranges with you.

[Inquisitive]

Originally Posted by Hatesrats

It's all good ALT...
I'm not here to argue apples & oranges with you.

I was agreeing with you, friend. Did you see all of those world-beaters I just named? Any one of them would give Mayweather trouble. Panomdej Ohyuthanakorn would probably KO him with a jab; guy's a beast.

[Miguel]

Originally Posted by Inquisitive

Majority of fans believe Marquez won at least two, and that's before the KO. .

Majority of fans know also Mayweather lost to Castilo in their first fight

[Miguel]

Originally Posted by Inquisitive

Mayweather did not fight 38 no-names, in a row, at any point in his career. Please just stop denying reality, ok? Pacquiao's record is super padded, even by boxing standards.

I don't even care for Mayweather, but I still admit he's the greatest boxer of his era.

Pacquiao has also fought almost 20 more times with no amateur career, his amateur career are those fights you mention...you clearly have an agenda so...

[Inquisitive]

Originally Posted by Miguel

Pacquiao has also fought almost 20 more times with no amateur career, his amateur career are those fights you mention...you clearly have an agenda so...

I know. Against those "world-beaters" I just listed.

No, that'd be his professional career. You can't just create an amateur career for him. Besides, Floyd's amateur opponents are probably better than all of the above.

[uraharakisuke]

Did some cunt just disregard Morales and Barrera?

[victor879]

He doesn't.

[Inquisitive]

Originally Posted by uraharakisuke

Did some cunt just disregard Morales and Barrera?

Pacquiao fanboys have such poor arguments based on such unsound logic. I don't know why this myth has persisted as long as it has.

[Miguel]

Originally Posted by Inquisitive

I know. Against those "world-beaters" I just listed.

No, that'd be his professional career. You can't just create an amateur career for him. Besides, Floyd's amateur opponents are probably better than all of the above.

You talk about unsound logic and you write this? If you have 50% more fights because your career had a different path how does that count against you? LOL

Floyd's resume at Welterweight is an absolute joke considering how long he's fought in the division. He has a great resume at 130.

[Inquisitive]

Originally Posted by Miguel

You talk about unsound logic and you write this? If you have 50% more fights because your career had a different path how does that count against you? LOL

Floyd's resume at Welterweight is an absolute joke considering how long he's fought in the division. He has a great resume at 130.

Because it was his decision to fight 38 tomato cans instead of fighting good opponents?