Boxing  

Forum Home Boxing Forum European British Classic Aussie MMA Training
Go Back   Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2012, 10:43 PM   #61
crimson
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,951
vCash: 500
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Not sure how Broner goes above Donaire and others. That is just too much.
Pac might be slightly too high.
crimson is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-11-2012, 10:54 PM   #62
BadDog
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 673
vCash: 500
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

I think if Floyd would be dead for 10 years they'll still keep him at number 1.
BadDog is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 10:59 PM   #63
SouthChicagoRay
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 272
vCash: 500
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Broner is for real whether you hate him or not!
SouthChicagoRay is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 11:04 PM   #64
Shogun Assassin
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,382
vCash: 75
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ5 View Post
Chuck is on quite a fail streak

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Shogun Assassin is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 11:09 PM   #65
DoktorSleepless
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 147
vCash: 500
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
In this older article about the Mayweather/Pacquiao tie for p4p, it says

Quote:
One question that emerged after Floyd Mayweather Jr. defeated Miguel Cotto on Saturday was sure to stir the passions of many fans: Did Mayweather do enough to supplant Manny Pacquiao atop THE RING’s pound-for-pound list?

Members of THE RING Ratings Panel pushed for Mayweather to become No. 1, citing his hard-fought but convincing victory over the top junior middleweight in the world.

Another argument against Pacquiao is that many people believe he was given a gift victory over Juan Manuel Marquez in his most-recent fight, the same Marquez who was overwhelmed by Mayweather.

Members of the Editorial Board leaned the other direction,pointing out that Mayweather had much more trouble with Cotto than Pacquiao did. The editors initially preferred to wait to see how Pacquiao looks against Tim Bradley on June 9 in Las Vegas before making a decision.
This suggest the ratings panel had some input on p4p lists, but the editorial board had the final decision.

But now apparently the p4p list is compiled solely by Chuck Giampa? No mention of the editorial board and it says the ratings panel has no input. I think this is a new change.

Quote:
Due to the recent activity among elite fighters in the past few months, here is Giampa’s updated Pound-for-Pound Top 10 list (Editor’s Note: the mythical pound-for-pound rankings are not compiled with input from the Ratings Panel as the divisional ratings are):
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
DoktorSleepless is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 11:18 PM   #66
oibighead
G.O.A.T.
East Side Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 6,261
vCash: 75
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoktorSleepless View Post
But now apparently the p4p list is compiled solely by Chuck Giampa? No mention of the editorial board and it says the ratings panel has no input. I think this is a new change.


[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]


Probably why they still have Pac so high on the list
oibighead is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 11:18 PM   #67
bballchump11
2011 Poster of the Year
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 30,517
vCash: 346
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadDog View Post
I think if Floyd would be dead for 10 years they'll still keep him at number 1.
idk why he wouldn't be there now
bballchump11 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 11:18 PM   #68
SUGAR J
P4P KING
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 1,023
vCash: 500
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

No Carl Froch in the top ten, disgrace.
SUGAR J is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 11:28 PM   #69
AJ5
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 822
vCash: 500
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoktorSleepless View Post
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
In this older article about the Mayweather/Pacquiao tie for p4p, it says



This suggest the ratings panel had some input on p4p lists, but the editorial board had the final decision.

But now apparently the p4p list is compiled solely by Chuck Giampa? No mention of the editorial board and it says the ratings panel has no input. I think this is a new change.


[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
I thought they had a panel before. This would explain the unusual movement in this latest P4P. With the panel you would expect some shuffling of fighters already on the list and since Pacquiao remains in the list, no new fighters would be added.
AJ5 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 12:02 AM   #70
bjl12
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,688
vCash: 1119
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Quote:
Originally Posted by mckay_89 View Post
1. Floyd
2. Ward
3. Marquez
4. Donaire
5. Martinez
6. Wlad
7. Pacquiao
8. Bradley
9. Mares
10. Froch
11. Viloria
13. Gonzalez
14. Garcia
15. Vitali
16. Broner
17. Moreno
18. Santa Cruz
19. Rigo
20. Guerrero
21. Trout
22. Gamboa
23. Haye
24. Canelo
25. Kessler
I think Gamboa and Canelo should be a little higher. Both are certainly higher than ****ing Garcia lmao. Top 10 is strong though
bjl12 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 12:06 AM   #71
Box702
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,288
vCash: 500
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Rigo,Gamboa,Matthysse will be on p4p this list soon if they keep fighting/beating top competition consistently as they are.All 3 have better resume then bradley,broner yet he gets 5x the love lol.Damn GB really were over their head in this one.That will make his downfall that much sweeter though.He is good & will be tough to beat but it's very possible.You can't built p4p fighters & expect them to last long.
Box702 is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 12:23 AM   #72
Beezy
2 Eazzy
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Baltimore, Maryland... USA
Posts: 2,239
vCash: 500
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ5 View Post
Chuck is on quite a fail streak

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Beezy is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 01:21 AM   #73
kirk
C1
East Side VIP
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ill swallow my Blood before i swallow my Pride
Posts: 25,165
vCash: 1001
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxed Ears View Post
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Have at 'em, laddies. Junk the funk out of their inboxes. At the most it will be annoying. To their secretaries.


but to be totally honest, I really dont think its a bad idea to start telling Ring how people feel on this.... you cant please all the people all the time, but this is absurd
kirk is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 01:26 AM   #74
MoJoGoodie
Belt holder
ESB Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,008
vCash: 75
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

conflict of intrest much
MoJoGoodie is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2012, 02:14 AM   #75
The Joker
Contender
ESB Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 1,270
vCash: 1000
Default Re: New Ring P4P list

Broner? Shit is hilarious.
The Joker is offline  Top
Reply With Quote
Reply

Boxing News 24 Forum > Boxing > General Boxing Forum

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Boxing News 24 Forum 2013