Ring Magazine Subscription Cancellation

[bazza12]

I'm not a fan of self-righteous threads, but I'm starting one this time, because having Adrien Broner at 5 pound for pound (and Guerrero at 10 if I'm feeling nit-picky) is ridiculous.

I'm calling "horse-shit" and cancelling my Ring subscription, and I encourage you to do the same.

It was once a respected magazine seen as the voice of boxing, but is gradually becoming mere vehicle of propaganda for a certain promotion company.

It won't make any kind of difference unless many people do it, and there are worse things in the world, but fuck it, I care so I'm doing it.

[oibighead]

You could have just cancelled it and not bitched about it like a little girl

[BigBone]

Can't you just change the address to mine?

[bazza12]

Originally Posted by oibighead

You could have just cancelled it and not bitched about it like a little girl

......yeah. I'm just gonna bitch like a little girl. Thanks for the tip though

[Xerant]

Well P4P is,mostly opinion base. Dont get butthurt about it.

[bazza12]

Originally Posted by Xerant

Well P4P is,mostly opinion base. Dont get butthurt about it.

Yeah, but unlike ours, the Ring magazine's is a traditional and well respected opinion.

Do you have Broner at 5? If not, why do you think a Golden Boy owned magazine does? Work it out.

[SUGAR J]

Originally Posted by bazza12

I'm not a fan of self-righteous threads, but I'm starting one this time, because having Adrien Broner at 5 pound for pound (and Guerrero at 10 if I'm feeling nit-picky) is ridiculous.

I'm calling "horse-shit" and cancelling my Ring subscription, and I encourage you to do the same.

It was once a respected magazine seen as the voice of boxing, but is gradually becoming mere vehicle of propaganda for a certain promotion company.

It won't make any kind of difference unless many people do it, and there are worse things in the world, but fuck it, I care so I'm doing it.

Well you are a fucktard then, Broner is well worth a top five spot on his record so far, he has Won all his fights without breaking sweat.

He is a better fighter than Guerrero IMo.

[bazza12]

Originally Posted by SUGAR J

Well you are a fucktard then, Broner is well worth a top five spot on his record so far, he has Won all his fights without breaking sweat.

He is a better fighter than Guerrero IMo.

Name Broner's top three wins.

Edit: And please don't tell me you do P4P based on potential. That's more bullshit.

[Auracle21]

who cares what htey rank fighters at? What does that have to do with the magazine itself. the person or people ranking do not write every article. Plus money talks. it is funny how people on here NEVER understand that.

[SUGAR J]

Originally Posted by bazza12

Name Broner's top three wins.

Edit: And please don't tell me you do P4P based on potential. That's more bullshit.

It's obvious he has a special talent, his last three Wins are his best. He will get even better and will be a top 3 p4p fighter for the next decade soon.

He is an unbeaten World Champion and he made Demarco (a top fighter) look ordinary.

Only bullshit is coming from you.

[H .]

but if Broner was british, he should be p4p #3.

[SUGAR J]

Originally Posted by H .

but if Broner was british, he should be p4p #3.

[Zopilote]

Originally Posted by SUGAR J

It's obvious he has a special talent, his last three Wins are his best. He will get even better and will be a top 3 p4p fighter for the next decade soon.

He is an unbeaten World Champion and he made Demarco (a top fighter) look ordinary.

Only bullshit is coming from you.

He has a special talent of course, and he may well be a top 3 p4p fighter soon, but as of what he has done and who he has beaten now does NOT get him to the list, and anyone who agrees with him being that high ranked; they clearly dont know shit.

This goes for Guerrero too.

[SUGAR J]

Originally Posted by Zopilote

He has a special talent of course, and he may well be a top 3 p4p fighter soon, but as of what he has done and who he has beaten now does NOT get him to the list, and anyone who agrees with him being that high ranked; they clearly dont know shit.

This goes for Guerrero too.

I agree on Guerrero, i do think Broner should be around 9 or 10 though, 5 is probably too high thinking about it, Froch missing from the top 10 makes the list stooopid.

[bazza12]

Originally Posted by Auracle21

who cares what htey rank fighters at? What does that have to do with the magazine itself. the person or people ranking do not write every article. Plus money talks. it is funny how people on here NEVER understand that.

Atrocious post. Money talks...so you agree with a promoter subtly influencing a magazine with huge tradition within the sport?

Originally Posted by SUGAR J

It's obvious he has a special talent, his last three Wins are his best. He will get even better and will be a top 3 p4p fighter for the next decade soon.

He is an unbeaten World Champion and he made Demarco (a top fighter) look ordinary.

Only bullshit is coming from you.

Of course he is a special talent. His win over DeMarco was superb. That is not enough to put him past Donaire, who has beaten Montiel and Darchinyan (who were both at the time top 10 pound for pound according to The Ring themselves!)

Other than that, Escobedo and Perez? You have to be fucking shitting me.

Originally Posted by H .

but if Broner was british, he should be p4p #3.

Nope. No he wouldn't. Can you tell me how you worked that one out, is it based on previous examples of British fighters being over-rated in the Ring's P4P lists or.....? Because it has to be said, Carl Froch has impressively beaten Bute, Pascal, Taylor and Abraham and he's nowhere to be seen. Ricky Burns has Roman Martinez, Katsidis, Mitchell and Moses and he's nowhere to be seen.

See you, clown.