|
|
|
#62 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 591
vCash: 500 |
The first pic is the mayweather fight you dumbass dont u see his cut man in the back or are u trolling because ur idol got KTFO
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 109
vCash: 500 |
Of course you can never rule PEDs out completely but imo the difference isn't all that big.
He was at about 10% bodyfat for the Fedchenko Fight and looks to be around 6% for the Pac fight. For someone who is around 140 that would mean losing 5.6 pounds of fat, an easy task if you have over 4 months to get it done, |
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Likes thick chicks
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In my own delusions...
Posts: 10,515
vCash: 314 |
A question for people who think JMM took peds...what effect would that last shot have had on Pacquiao if he wasn't on peds?
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Amateur
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 17,624
vCash: 0 |
What a cheap trick. The photo in the top left corner is from the Mayweather fight. Rosary, no goatee, Triple H in the background.
And if you want to see what he looked like against Fedchenko in comparison, some photos with a frontal view would help: http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/...88739791_n.jpghttp://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/...95425040_n.jpg Cut off the extra weight, build some shoulder mass, and this is what you get in the lead-up to Pacquiao-Marquez 4: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Angel was with him for both fights, so any difference in physique likely says nothing either way. Try again. |
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Dinamita
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Middle of Nowhere
Posts: 10,173
vCash: 500 |
That top pic in the left corner is from the Mayweather fight LOL.
This kid keeps on failing and failing. |
|
|
|
#74 | ||
|
★★★★☆
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,554
vCash: 160 |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|