|
|
|
#571 | ||||
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,977
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Would you take the undercard slot for less than you make normally without a guaranteed Jones-shot? I sure would not knowing Jones elusiveness at the negotiating table. Who's to say that Jones wouldn't back out and tell everyone that he'd now pursue a shot at Holyfield/Tyson/Lewis instead? I'd say Kohl would be a terrible businessman if just took such an offer. Quote:
|
||||
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#573 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 3,828
vCash: 500 |
green eyed monster syndrome - asking who the greatest fighter of his era 'ducked' when most of the names people come up with will be european fighters who never went over to make the fight happen!
20 years on and the 'rules' remain the same - if you want to fight the best boxers on the planet, you need to get your ass on a plane and make it happen or be doomed to euro obscurity |
|
|
|
#574 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,305
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Roy wasn't at his absolute peak until he was in his mid 20's at 168. I think there's a lot of fighters that would have given him trouble. I think a younger Mike McCallum would have given him all he could handle. But Mike's peak was at 154. So they would have been at different weights. But I think a younger 160 version of Mike, like the one Toney fought would have troubled him. I think Herol Bomber Graham would also have caused him a lot of trouble. Although Bomber's peak was in the 80's really. A young Micheal Nunn would have caused him a lot of trouble at 160, but not so much at 168, and I think he'd faded quite a lot at 175. Jackson and the G-Man would have been dangerous. At 168, I think Eubank would have been a little awkward. I think Benn would have charged him and been dangerous for about 4/5 rounds. Liles would definitely have troubled Roy being a southpaw with his attributes. I Honestly don't believe that Collins or Calzaghe would have caused him that much trouble when he was in his peak. DM at 175 would have caused him a bit of trouble, but I'd have picked Roy to outpoint him in the end. Styles make fights. I think he'd have had his hands full with the fighters I've mentioned, especially Nunn and McCallum earlier. But without being biased, I honestly think he'd have beaten them all. I think people tend to forget just how fast he was, especially at 160. I think his speed would have caused lots of problems, and neutralised a lot of their attacks. Regards, Loudon. |
|
|
|
|
#575 |
|
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,797
vCash: 910 |
I heard a guy called silencer used set up questions and answer them himself through his alt account!! Every sort of nutjob passes through this place. Hahaha
|
|
|
|
#580 | |||
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,305
vCash: 500 |
[quote=round15;14402354]
Quote:
Hi mate, Go to post 78 on this thread to read about DM. Roch was supposed to be fighting Roy in 2000, and Telesco was Roy's replacement. Quote:
This doesn't make an ounce of sense to me. How could Roy have had a trilogy with Toney and Hopkins? Unless you think that Hop would have won an earlier rematch, it doesn't make sense. Trilogies come when two fighters have a close fight, and then there's a call for a rematch. If both fighters are 1-1 then a rubber match is the decider, or they may have been controversy surrounding the result. Roy embarrassed James Toney. There was no need to fight him again. I think if he had have done, then the result would have been the same, if Roy was peak. But there was never any need to rematch him in the first place. I respect your opinion, but I can't understand your thinking. Quote:
Regards, Loudon. |
|||
|
|
|
#581 |
|
Dinamita
ESB Full Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oxnard, Ca
Posts: 341
vCash: 676 |
It's not that he didn't fight nobody. It's just that he made them look like nobody. Y'ALL MUST OF FORGOT!!! [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWdT_bso2qE"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWdT_bso2qE[/ame]
|
|
|
|
#582 | |||||||
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,305
vCash: 500 |
[quote=BatTheMan;14403346]
Quote:
Kohl dismissed the proposal Quote:
DM was getting paid $1M-$1.5M The double header was a good idea to hype the fight, to make it big. Kohl turned down the opportunity, and then DM continued fighting guys like Hall for the same money he'd been on. Now what does that say to you?? Quote:
Quote:
The fight with Roy was worth about $6M to DM. Quote:
Quote:
At the end of the rainbow, there was a potential $6M and a chance to win his old belts back. The opportunity was turned down, to instead carry on fighting guys like Hall and Harmon for $1M-1.5M Wake the fuck up! According to Kohl, DM was too good to appear on an undercard with Roy, even though it would have hyped the fight for a huge unification showdown. Apparently DM was too proud. Funny how he then went on to fight Richard Hall twice. Too proud to promote a fight with the best fighter in the world, but he was ok fighting Harmon and Hall. Right, I've got you! Makes perfect sense. Kohl was either the WORST BUSINESSMAN who's ever been in business, or DM didn't want the fight. Which one are you going with? Quote:
He fought on HBO 25 times. Of course he was commited, they paid him a fortune, and everybody wanted the fight. You haven't got a clue. Nobody could come to the conclusion that you have, after reading those 5 articles and watching that video. So I'm assuming you're winding me up, for a laugh? Nobody could be this daft. You really are the Danish Bailey. You and him would be the greatest lawyers that had ever lived. You should get in contact with him. You could both make millions. Regards, Loudon. |
|||||||
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|