|
|
|
#1 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,308
vCash: 773 |
I always thought it was Bob Fitzsimmons but i'm hearing more about how Stanley Ketchel had to have his sparring partners wearing baseball chest protectors, both fighters proved their power at heavyweight but which one hit harder in your opinion ?
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Diamond Dog
East Side VIP
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 34,759
vCash: 1000 |
Ketchel didn't prove his power to anything like the degree that Fitz did at HW. At MW, there is an argument to be had over who hit harder, but up at HW, it's Fitz all over. Unquestionably the better of the two punchers.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
P4P King
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19,147
vCash: 1000 |
Fitzsimmons was undoubtedly the more dangerous puncher, but you could make an argument that Ketchel had more one punch power, on the grounds that what Fitzsimmos did was partly down to delivery.
I would personaly have little enthusiasm for the prospect of being hit by either of them. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,762
vCash: 685 |
I wouldnt have thought it close, tbh. I get the feeling that Ketchell had a better workrate, but would consider the difference in power almost like comparing Hagler or Hearns to Tyson. Fitz had true heavyweight power. Ketchell may (or may not) have knocked down a great heavyweight, but the reality was that that great fighter largely wasnt troubled by Ketchell's power. I am pretty sure Langford, Choynski, Maher and many others hit a level above Ketchell.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Cornwalls Finest
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: In the opposite corner
Posts: 98
vCash: 500 |
'Ruby Roberts' punch power was superior to Ketchel.
However we do not know if Ketchell would have developed a more powerful punch as he got older, as of course Ketchels life was ended at age 24 by Walter Dipleys bullet |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|