My prediction 2013: Geale defeats Golovkin

[TheManBearPig]

The GGG dickriding has reached a whole new level on the General Forum.

You all say Geale doesn't have a chance despite proving himself against world class opponents and unifying titles. GGG struggled against a washed up, blown up 154 fighter in Kassim Ouma and was behind on the cards of many including ESBs very own IntentionalButt along with ringside observers. Why? Because his poor defence was exposed and as well as the fact that he struggles with anyone who sets a fast pace in the fight and if Ouma hadn't gassed, GGG would not have an undefeated record today.

For the nuffies who say Geale has a bad chin because he got dropped early in his career, it's clear you haven't watched those fights as the KD were due to being off-balance due to his smothering and fast paced style. Go watch those fights if you don't believe me.

And Karaganda, that has to be one of the most bias comparisons I've ever read. Geale holds no advantage of GGG in regards to boxing arsenal?? That already tells me you are a clear GGG dickrider.

[Leftsmash]

Originally Posted by MidniteProwler

Golovkin said he would fight anyone from 154 to 168 Bika would KO him IMO, I'm just tired of the claim that everybody is ducking GGG, make all the excuse's you like for him not to fight Bika, but Bika infact has fought at 160 before.

Bika has made no challenge anyway (well aside from words to that effect from yourself at some pub) so there would be no excuses at this stage.

[MidniteProwler]

Originally Posted by Leftsmash

Bika has made no challenge anyway (well aside from words to that effect from yourself at some pub) so there would be no excuses at this stage.

If Golovkin ever found the balls to fight Bika I would back Bika to win by KO inside 6 rounds.

Also I am not a Geale fan boy, I'm actually going for Mundine and think he has a chance to pull the upset, I just don't like how Geale's accomplishments are discredited and most think its a gimme that GGG would make easy work of him based on him beating 1 top 15 rated fighter...

[The Akbar One]

Originally Posted by TheManBearPig

Geale overrated?? Are you ****ing kidding? On this forum, despite defeating Felix Sturm and Sebastian Sylvester in their own backyard and unifying the WBA and IBF middleweight titles, he gets zero respect and credit from anyone on this forum, yet Golovkin ko a guy with one of the worst defensive displays I have witnessed in the last 10 years and apparently he is unbeatable and is a future all time great according to some of the nuffies. Not to mention the retards on this forum having a orgasm over him feasting on yet ANOTHER blown up 154 fighter. Get real you ****ing deluded moron.

He doesn't do anything great, he is a workman, and persistent. Beating Sturm has been done before. It can be argued that Macklin beat Sturm, more than Geale did. I thought the Sturm vs Geale fight could go either way. Using Sturm as a bench mark anyway is stupid. Some of you must of just started watching boxing, a younger, better version of Sturm was stopped by old ass Javier Castillejo, who wasn't all that great himself.

[Leftsmash]

Originally Posted by TheManBearPig

And Karaganda, that has to be one of the most bias comparisons I've ever read. Geale holds no advantage of GGG in regards to boxing arsenal?? That already tells me you are a clear GGG dickrider.

Well you didn't refute anything there with that response .

[Eastcoast]

Most likely scenario is after Geale beats Mundine, Sturm will UD Soliman and Geale will have to go back to Germany to fight Sturm as his mando and Sturm will take the title back and there'll be a third fight at the end of the year. No Golovkin-Geale for 2013. Better chance for a Golovkin-Lara fight.

[IntentionalButt]

Yeah, what does Geale clearly do better than Golovkin?

I can't think of anything...and I like Geale.

[TheManBearPig]

Originally Posted by Leftsmash

Well you didn't refute anything there with that response .

Why would I bother arguing with someone who has only seen Daniel Geale fight once when he beat the number #2 middleweight yet he think is "chanceless" against a hypejob whose greatest victory is over a top 15 bum who couldn't defend himself if his life depended on it?
Like Mark Twain once said: "Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience".

Funny that you want to point out that I didn't refute anything he said. I'm still waiting for your counter argument as to why you think Felix Sturm is apparently "shot" at 33 years old?

[Vysotsky]

Originally Posted by TheManBearPig

Why would I bother arguing with someone who has only seen Daniel Geale fight once when he beat the number #2 middleweight yet he think is "chanceless" against a hypejob whose greatest victory is over a top 15 bum who couldn't defend himself if his life depended on it?
Like Mark Twain once said: "Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience".

Funny that you want to point out that I didn't refute anything he said. I'm still waiting for your counter argument as to why you think Felix Sturm is apparently "shot" at 33 years old?

There have been opinions given by people for why they think Golovkin beats him, raising valid points, yet the Aussie's haven't put forth anything aside from hiding behind some overrated wins. The most simple explaination is a light punching swarmer who relies on volume isnt going to beat Golovkin.

Using the logic you're hiding behind:

Macklin and Murray accomlished as much as Geale and neither of those 3 are as good as Castijello. Having it 7/5 Sturm was just as legit and Sylvester was never elite....getting demolished by Proksa right after Geale.

[MidniteProwler]

Hey Vysotsky, Golovkins dick sure is tasty...

[fistsof steel]

Originally Posted by MidniteProwler

Hey Vysotsky, Golovkins dick sure is tasty...

MidniteProwler Bika's Dick must be delicious if thats the case.!!!!!

[MidniteProwler]

Originally Posted by fistsof steel

MidniteProwler Bika's Dick must be delicious if thats the case.!!!!!

Why coz I think he will beat GGG?
I don't think Sakio is the greatest of all time I just think he will beat GGG.
Not like the GGG fan boys who think he is unbeatable...

[vast]

geale is tough but too easy to hit. He is made to order for GGG. Geale is tough but lacks power. I actually think (and hate myself for doing so) that mundine will whip geale. so no GGG-Geale fight in 2013

[Leftsmash]

Originally Posted by TheManBearPig

Funny that you want to point out that I didn't refute anything he said. I'm still waiting for your counter argument as to why you think Felix Sturm is apparently "shot" at 33 years old?

Counter arguement? The only part you continue to repeat is his win over a past his best Sturm that ended up down to a SD (For the record I had it 115-113 Sturm). Sturm managed to look prime against Zbik but his other 2 fights preceding that he seemed to be floundering, Zbik was actually just shit, that's why he looked prime and that's what you and the rest of them cling onto.

[Tyler-Durden]

Originally Posted by MidniteProwler

Yeah true because GGG is showing he has a lot of balls fighting a 154 pound fighter Rosado.

When the small Rosado gets KO'd get ready for the Jizz flying everywhere on ESB about GGG's great power... Geales KO win over Karmarzin is more impressive then anything GGG has done...

So tell me the name of who he could have fought instead ?

AND DON'T TELL ME BIKA YOU ASSHOLE AS YOU CAN PROVIDE US WITH A DECENT PROOF OF BIKA WANTING TO FIGHT GGG, ASSHOLE.