|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,508
vCash: 1551 |
Quote:
Ali only really won the third round. |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,590
vCash: 0 |
If Eastern Europeans and russians were fighting in the 50s, boxing would be dead and the weakest eras would have started then.
If they started to dominate in the 70s, the 50s wouldve been the golden era. If they began dominating in the 80s, the 60s would have been the golden era. When black and/or american fighters are no longer the dominant fighters of boxing it's a weak era. When they are on top, it's the toughest era ever and the golden age of boxing. If you disagree, you DKSAB. |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
WWWRAAAAHHHHH
East Side VIP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: S.F Bay Area by way of Bytom Polska
Posts: 15,735
vCash: 197 |
Suggesting all would be successful because of there work in the AM's would be false.
Without question the Boxing landscape would look different though. |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
He's A Good Boy
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Long Island,New York
Posts: 1,186
vCash: 75 |
This thread drips with jealousy and Anti USA sentiment.
The only countries that didnt fight were what? Cuba and USSR? Does anyone really believe that USSR/CUBA would produce some sort of super fighter who would be able to dethrone Ali or any of the great champs? NO because it wouldn't happen. It would just be another victory for Ali or SRR or whomever. The old American champs fought guys from all the countries that were able to give fighters who were actually good enough. It just so happened that the best fighters were American/Latin American. |
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 7,008
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
![]() You mad bro? You have a massive chip on your shoulder. |
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,052
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Western Euro's are on average not as large or aggressive as Eastern The title of Heavyweight "world" champion prior to the fall of the iron curtain will always have an * next to it..... |
|
|
|
|
#30 | |||||
|
Visionary!
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 335
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ali lost to Bonavena as an amateur, Drew with Mildenberger and lost to John Hampton. Ali's amateur record is less than stellar. The soviets had only just started competing at the games around the time Ali turned pro and the Cubans started in the 70's i believe. Had ali had to face the likes of Stevenson or Igor Vysotsky im sure he would have struggled! All the current top Slavic heavyweights were in their mid-teens when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, and represent only the first generation of Slavic heavyweights. Historically, boxing has been driven by fighters from poor, urban backgrounds. There are plenty of young men who meet that description in the former Soviet Union, plenty of promotional muscle in germany etc looking to cultivate them, and the next generation of Slav heavyweights will be brought up with a later career in the pros fully in mind. In the long term the Slav heavyweights are here to stay. As for Robinson he only ever won the golden gloves. Quote:
Most of the greatest amateurs ever are non american: Laszlo Papp Felix Savon Teofilo Stevenson Boris Lagutin Aleksei Tishchenko (still active) Mario Kindelán Oleg Saitov (The greatest amateur boxer of the 90's) Jerzy Kulej Vladimir Yengibaryan Vasyl Lomachenko (still active) Have you heard of Lomachenko? The great guillermo was voted only one time as the best amateur boxer in the world by AIBA, while Lomachenko has been voted already 3 times at the age of what 22 or 23? No doubt u will point me to Foreman and Frazier. U do know that Cepulis was in his late 20's and Hans Huber (whom Frazier defeated by a razor thin decision) was in his 30's dont u? That is ancient in amateur terms! Quote:
Last edited by DREAMCATCHER; 01-05-2013 at 05:28 AM. |
|||||
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|