|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,306
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,244
vCash: 568 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
#18 |
|
newbie
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 1
vCash: 500 |
Very intresting thread guys, I'm a newbie looking at my first match early 2013, I come from a bodybuilding background so creatine has always intrested me for boxing. A lot of food for thought here. Am trying to cut 15kgs (I haven't lifted for awhile!!) so I think the water retention would be a big problem for me. Thanks guys
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North East, England.
Posts: 2,559
vCash: 1432 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Nak Muay
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 450
vCash: 1000 |
It is not.
You WILL retain water if you take Creatine Monohydrate. It will take about 7-14 days for your body to go back to normal. As a fighter I experimented with this. I walk around about 75kg. I took creatine (diet EXACTLY the same) and my weight went up to 80kg in 6 weeks. I stopped taking creatine and was down to 76/76.5kg within about 10 days. The alternative is Creatine Ethyl Ester. You will not retain the water due to the fact it isn't bonded with water, rather it is Monohydrate with ether attached (which the body better absorbs). However, there are studies that show the rate of strength and power increases is not quite as high as Monohydrate. So, you have to weight it up: Monohydrate is likely to give you slightly better results (but you will look puffy whilst getting them) vs Ethyl Ester (which certainly boosts your creatine levels - but whether more or less than Monohydrate hasn't been conclusively proven). |
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,244
vCash: 568 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 319
vCash: 500 |
If your worried about the first 10 seconds of every round then creatine may have some tiny benefits to boxing but after the initial 10 seconds its basically useless, more water to carry at the expense of other energy systems throughout the fight, increased body temperature, a better idea would be to eat balanced meals of carb protien etc to refill glycogen storage and to do some intervals and long distance running evry so often, dont worry about somthing that is always present in the body and that the body has no interest in stockpiling, dont need no quotes or studys withoutwire just learn your basic anat phys. This is your research not ours
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,695
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
As a boxer you'd feel very little difference if any in terms of performance when taking creatine. |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,244
vCash: 568 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North East, England.
Posts: 2,559
vCash: 1432 |
Quote:
Francaux & Poortmans (1999) found 3.74lbs weight gain over 9 weeks (including a loading phase) and Kutz & Grunter (2003) saw around 1kg over 6 weeks I believe it was. Never saw such retention in the literature or anecdotally, although I do accept that retention will vary; it seems dose-dependant; Rawson et al last year saw no retention with intake of 2.5g I think it was. I don't think there's any harm in seeing how you respond both performance-wise and in regards to weight fluctuations. If you see no scale-weight change but notice performance benefits in the gym - you may aswell take it, it's cheap and safe enough. Last edited by Jdsm; 01-03-2013 at 04:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,695
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Studies have shown it has no negative effects on body temperature and there's research that shows it helps prevent against concussions effects: Dr. Kreider: "From a neurological perspective, there are good reasons athletes, especially those in contact sports, should be taking creatine. Data was presented this summer showing that kids with traumatic brain injury have better outcomes and survival rates when put on a course of creatine than kids who don't get creatine. It's amazing how much neuroprotection occurs when these kids get creatine. Same with concussions. People who have higher creatine concentrations in the brain show a neuroprotective effect. In contact sports like football, it makes sense that they should be taking creatine. You could actually make the case that not allowing football players to take creatine would put them at higher risk than if they did. Creatine would help with concussions, temperature regulation, and recovery." [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Last edited by dealt_with; 01-04-2013 at 07:30 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|