|
|
|
#16 |
|
newbie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Durham
Posts: 46
vCash: 500 |
only names I can think of are not better per-se but comparable and they are as follow (in no particular order):
Ward, Mares, Donaire, Martinez |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
newbie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Durham
Posts: 46
vCash: 500 |
that sentence you underlined was meant to be interpereted as just as good/better/slightly not as good, wasnt meant to read as 'these guys' records are not as good' It is supposed to read 'these guys arguable have comperable or better records' sort of sentence
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
newbie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Durham
Posts: 46
vCash: 500 |
nah. as much as i love floyd he's just not active enough to claim this. too inconsistent and sporadic with his appearances. and Devon?? Nah. Hell nah his best fights were maidana and tim, thats it. I may as well say Amir Khan, as a matter of fact, hes not a bad choice for this thread. he's been in some good ones the past few years fighting top tiers.
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 874
vCash: 1000 |
I'd have it
#1 Ward #2 Froch #3 Kessler Kessler only has a razor thin win over Froch but Froch has fought better opposition than kessler so he must go #2 it's not like Kessler dominated froch or anything it was razor thin.Froch also did a damn sight better than Kessler did against ward, ward dominated kessler and beat him up he outboxed froch but didn't take froch's soul. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|