|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Nigel Benn's Best Performance | |||
| Chris Eubank I |
|
2 | 1.94% |
| Chris Eubank II |
|
8 | 7.77% |
| Iran Barkley |
|
11 | 10.68% |
| Doug DeWitt |
|
0 | 0% |
| Robbie Simms |
|
0 | 0% |
| Gerald McClellan |
|
77 | 74.76% |
| Lou Gent |
|
1 | 0.97% |
| Mauro Galvano II |
|
1 | 0.97% |
| Dan Sherry |
|
1 | 0.97% |
| Anthony Logan |
|
2 | 1.94% |
| Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#76 |
|
newbie
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 35
vCash: 500 |
I see that the performance against Mcclellan is way. Does anyone not feel that the outcome of this fight would've been different had Mcclellan not get the bloodcot to his brain, or whatever preceded that?
He seemed off for rounds, he couldn't put his gum shield on properly. He was never knocked down, only went down voluntarily. In fact, he got up as soon as he was counted out. Do we not see that the Mcclellan we saw that fight, wasn't the real him, well not for the majority of the fight. So beating up this lesser version of the man, isn't as much of an accomplishment? Or is it a case of crediting Benn for the heart and determination he put in to the fight, just by getting back in the ring after round 1? |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 246
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Gerald had a devastating 1st round, but he also hurt Benn numerous times during the fight, even as late as the 8th round i believe. So the version we saw of him was not a lesser version, just not able to take Benns punches without suffering that dreadful outcome. |
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,962
vCash: 1000 |
But how good was McClellan? We don't really know because he never went beyond one round. He looked slightly better against Sanderline Williams than Benn or Toney did, but was 50/50 with Julian Jackson in a battle of punchers where it came down to who had the best chin.
If Benn got through that opening round, he was likely to hold his own. |
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 986
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
I've never been a Benn fan and have always prefered Eubank, but the effort that night against McClellan eclipses anything that either man (Benn or Eubank) would achieve on any other night in their careers for me. It was a truly astonishing display of balls and courage, and one of the best atmospheres you're ever likely to see in the sport. Shame about the tragic events after mind. |
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,962
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 986
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Expand your horizons. |
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Archie Solis
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 581
vCash: 500 |
Eubank 2. Simply because he showed me he had improved and had become a better fighter than Eubank. The fact he was able to best Eubank, albeit without getting the decision, told me that Eubank and Watson simply exploited Benn's wreckless aggression which he'd developed from knocking everyone out. Once he'd learned from those mistakes he was a better fighter. Eubank got worse rather than better to. He simply exploited Benn at a point in his career where he thought he only needed one to win.
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,962
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Nothing Ward, Jones or Calzaghe did at 168 can top the performances of Eubank-Watson II, Eubank-Rocchigiani, Benn-Eubank II, Benn-McClellan, Toney-Barkley and Toney-Littles, considering the quality of opposition. Eubank, Benn and Toney were a million times more active, too - real throwback stuff. |
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
newbie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 10
vCash: 1000 |
Oh really? That's pretty cool. I know beating McClellan is a greater achievement and Eubank II is a better boxing clinic but he's never been meaner than in that fight.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|