|
|
|
#811 | |
|
Fabulous, darling!
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A cut above my left nose
Posts: 3,030
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#812 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,074
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#813 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,174
vCash: 1000 |
[quote=Seamus;14524339]I would gamble my house on the fact that Rahman, Brewster, Sanders and McCall hit harder than Walcott. In fact, of those four, power is the one constant. McCall had the chin, Rahman the jab, Sanders the speed... but power in an era of super heavies (which for all intents and purpose should be a different division) is what they all really possessed... not power against blown-up light heavies with a sprinkling of pituitary cases but power night in and night out against legit modern super heavies.[/quote
a punch is a punch and a puncher can take out any man...I seen Chris handle Tua with ease and also stayed in with Vitali and he was supposed to the little guys with ease but there are other factors and the 190lbers from the 50's could crack I agree that the size of guys has changed and the 190lbers from the 1950's would now weight 240lbs but never seen Byrd embarrassed like this [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] |
|
|
|
#814 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,074
vCash: 1000 |
Then, why the bother with weight divisions?
Seriously, guys with the frames of Marciano and Charles and Walcott would weigh 240 pounds? That is beyond ridiculous. |
|
|
|
#815 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 537
vCash: 500 |
[quote=Bummy Davis;14525298]
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#816 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,761
vCash: 500 |
Certainly not Marciano or Charles but Walcott certainly could, although not necassarily would, ask people who have met him in real life how big the dude was. Walcott was around 195lbs in the 1950's while juggling a 9-5, boxing and his family he even admitted there was about a 10 year period where he was basically always hungry/starving. Give him a modern upbringing with modern food and dieting, some weights, the fat percentage of most top heavyweights nowadays, some PEDS and see how his weight would go up.
|
|
|
|
#817 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,074
vCash: 1000 |
[quote=rusak;14525400]Hell, it happened to Roy Jones, Jr, earlier with less of a drop in weight. Going back down the ladder is a dangerous thing to do late in a career.
|
|
|
|
#818 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 647
vCash: 500 |
Weight divisions are for the lower classes where 5-10 pounds can make a big difference. Hwt division has always been termed "unlimited".
To say that Walcott, Louis, Dempsey, Marciano could not KD or KO Wlad or any big man with a single blow is just plain stupidity. Certainly they could and it would not need to be a freak blow that some posters are implying. Brewster was a bum and he Koed Wlad. History of boxing is full of small hwts knocking out huge fighters. Louis Koed every big man he ever faced. Where did size ever help anyone who fought Ali? Look at the hwts 170 pound Mickey Walker Koed and Koed early. Look at the hwts Moore Koed. With punching power its timing, speed and the ability to put your bodyweight behind the blow that really matters. With these skills you can KO any man at any time. |
|
|
|
#819 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,537
vCash: 1551 |
Quote:
Technically he only TKOd Wlad, which means a little bit less than a KO. Big hws only lose when the naturally lighter fighters are much more skilled. Joe Louis outweighted 70% of his opponents! He was the big man in the division himself. So did Lennox Lewis. Mike Tyson outweighted the majority when he was in his prime, Frazier did, Ali did, Liston did, Foreman did, Wlad does, Vitali does, Bowe did. And before saying a guy like Tyson always had to fight taller men, lenght doesn't mean shit. Oscar de la Hoya is rangier, taller, faster, more skilled than David Tua, he still wouldn't survive 1 round. Also why would someone who can make the cruiser limit and isn't lazy ever go to hw division besides money and fame? |
|
|
|
|
#821 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,074
vCash: 1000 |
Dateline May 22nd, 1953
After years of arduous training, Rocky Marciano succeeds in raising his arms aloft and over his own head, his fists reaching a dizzying height of 6 foot and 3 inches, heretofore never attained.
|
|
|
|
#824 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,537
vCash: 1551 |
Quote:
![]() I thought he could reach 213 cm. But 190cm is really "terrible" |
|
|
|
|
#825 | ||
|
Fabulous, darling!
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A cut above my left nose
Posts: 3,030
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Quote:
Walcott might have made the grade a little better, but no way does he reach the 240s without turning himself into a human punchingbag. Most modern heavyweights are only in the 240s because they're lazy. Unless you're over six four/six five, you're not going to be able to hold that weight well and still be able to fight at your best. |
||
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|