Vlad Klitschko vs the following

[ChrisPontius]

Originally Posted by orriray59

What exactly do punch stats prove? That Wlad teed of on Wach, and not as much against Chagaev?

What exactly does that prove?

It's called "setting up a strawman argument".

[dinovelvet]

What does it prove? It proves that in his last fight his workrate was at an all time high. The very opposite of being in decline.
You dont really know why you said he has declined ,probably just to argue with me , and now you're stuck in a corner not knowing where you are.

[dinovelvet]

What?

[dinovelvet]

Are you stupid?

[dinovelvet]

Originally Posted by orriray59

I've done some stupid things, said some stupid things. Don't think I've ever shown such a basic misunderstanding of a simple thing, though.

You've gone off track to the point you dont know what you're arguing against. You had no answer so you brought up Kevin Johnson. This is why ive ignored you in the past. You're a clueless teenager that posts like Bert Sugar on your own but in a debate prove you know shit about boxing.

[Synthetic Decay]

Punch output has fuck all to do with decline.

[Absolutely!]

Originally Posted by dinovelvet

You dont really know why you said he has declined ,probably just to argue with me , and now you're stuck in a corner not knowing where you are.

I'll give this guy points. He really does try.

[Absolutely!]

Originally Posted by orriray59

I know he's been trolling for the past few days now. If not weeks.

From the start, I think.

[dinovelvet]

Originally Posted by Absolutely!

From the start, I think.

Band up with a fraud whos been watching box a few years. He's definitely your suit. Have fun consolidating each other.

[Seamus]

Originally Posted by dinovelvet

Steward himself said those fighters were duds.
You quote part of the post thats convenient to you. Nice cop out. You're done.

Do you care to reference a quote wherein Steward dismissed all the fighters I listed?

Or are you too busy keeping track of who is and isn't logged in?

[dinovelvet]

Originally Posted by Seamus

Do you care to reference a quote wherein Steward dismissed all the fighters I listed?

Or are you too busy keeping track of who is and isn't logged in?

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Seamus]

Originally Posted by dinovelvet

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Silly Ballyhoo for a fight no one thought would be competitive.

Why wasn't Chisora ranked higher than those I mentioned?

[dinovelvet]

Originally Posted by Seamus

Silly Ballyhoo for a fight no one thought would be competitive.

Why wasn't Chisora ranked higher than those I mentioned?

We know what he did to Vitali. Vitali can take it Wlad cant.

[Seamus]

A panel of 20 experts with no money in the fight, many who are known in these parts, picked 12-8 in favor of a Peter victory (including our beloved Adam Pollack).

It's on b o x i n g s c e n e.com. For some reason, I can't post the link.

The point being Peter was seen by experts, by people who make money in the field, as a major threat in the division, someone nobody wanted their charge to face.

[dinovelvet]

Originally Posted by Seamus

Here's what a panel of experts with no money in the fight, many who are known in these parts, thought of the threat of Peter versus Waldo. Their consensus is 12-8 in favor of a Peter victory (including our beloved Adam Pollack).

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Peter was a sparring partner for Wlad, he knew him inside and out. The guy was useless. Steward himself said it. You know it and i know it. You're grasping at straws at this point.
Hilenius knocked him out worse than Wlad did and Chisora beat the breaks off Hilenius.