|
|
|
#901 |
|
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,079
vCash: 910 |
Thats just ridiculousness. I seen Rocky pummell bigger guys with a nonstop attack that only gained momentum as the rounds past. Wlad being bigger isn't going to shield him from the brutal assualt Rocky would be bringing him. You neglect the body attack. Have you ever taken shots to the body? I have, by a trainer who was almost a pro. Its sickening. Brewster ****ed Wlad up by going downstairs. I counted only 3 body shot s landed within the first 3 rounds and Wlad was visibly panting in his corner. Rocky chops him down inside where he has no power or inside game.
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#902 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 287
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
That's the problem, getting inside. Brewster took Wlad's legs with a left hook to the head if i remember rightly, Brewster was a big puncher. It's not impossible, but you are disregarding the danger of Wlad's offence and how much his range keeping and movement to that end has improved. |
|
|
|
|
#904 | |
|
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,448
vCash: 330 |
Quote:
I've never taken a body shot as I'm a teacher and not a boxer. Brewster got Wlad to gas, no doubt. He took a lot of shots to get there though and I can't see Rocky taking the same shots nor hitting as hard as Brewster did. In the rematch we saw Brewster fail to match his prior success. If wlad isn't 100% history shows he tires early and in that case I'd pick Rocky by knockout late on. However peak for peak I'm taking a 100% wlad who isn't gonna gas so easily. |
|
|
|
|
#905 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 643
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Valdes was 6' 3" or so and about 207-215 most of the time. Louis was 6' 2" and 213 for Marciano. Bob Baker was 6' 2" and 210 and defeated Valdes twice. But Valdes was beaten twice by Moore and also by Satterfield, and Baker was ko'd by both Moore and Satterfield. Weill tried to talk up a Baker fight with Marciano in 1955 but the press and public demanded that Moore get the shot. |
|
|
|
|
#906 | |
|
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,079
vCash: 910 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#907 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Posts: 10,118
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I'll go through my tapes again and see if I can find that fight. |
|
|
|
|
#908 | |
|
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,448
vCash: 330 |
Quote:
To be fair to Marciano he defeated who he had to defeat at the time he defeated them. It's just in this instance the criticism I hold is he isn't proven against big guys. I don't hold him not fighting those guys against him because he better better ranked challengers. It's just unfortunate those better ranked challengers were all smaller men when it comes to comparisons like this. |
|
|
|
|
#910 | |
|
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,079
vCash: 910 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#911 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 8,239
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Baker and Valdez were beaten by Moore and they were also trying to make an interest in a Valdes fight for Rocky's 50 win but Valdes got beaten and dropped for a 9 count in the last round by Satterfeild a few weeks before Marciano-Moore....Satterfeild was already blasted out in 2 by Charles and Valdes lost any chance of making a Marciano fight marketable....Baker was KO'd by Moore so fight 50 would have to been a rematch vs Moore and other than the flash KD by Moore, Archie was pretty much dominated by Marciano but Archie was on his best win streak leading up to Marciano and had beaten many of the Big Heavyweights as well as the smaller talented guys in that streak marred only by a DQ loss and a controversial decision that he avenged by KO over Harold Johnson an ATG |
|
|
|
|
#912 | |
|
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,448
vCash: 330 |
Quote:
Neither have faced the required styles. So itsa question of who you give the benefit of doubt to. I personally go with the big great one as opposed to the little great one. |
|
|
|
|
#913 |
|
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,079
vCash: 910 |
Wlad being great is an opinion. He doesn't embody the characteristics that made guys like Marciano, Louis, Tyson great.
His greatness has been measured by some by the amount of weak opposition he has beaten on the trott. Unfortunately for him and this debate thats not a skill and doesn't win fights against former ATGs. |
|
|
|
#915 | |
|
requiescat in pace
East Side VIP
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England, Up North
Posts: 22,448
vCash: 330 |
Quote:
Like I said I give the benefit of the doubt to the big great. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|