|
|
|
#16 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
vCash: 500 |
hahaha this is all FUNNY
BECAUSE, foreman would NEVER, EVER,EVER get into the ring with him, who wins is hard to say but its interesting that everyone will tell you how big and powerful foreman was, and no one could stand up to him and had to move BUT in the 80's and early 90's he fought cruiseweights mostly and you mention ruddock ok but foreman who you say never had nothing to fear from strong guys that would stand in front of him some how never fought RUDDOCK, BONECRUSHER SMITH FRANK BRUNO RIDDICK BOWE TIM WITHERSPOON OLIVER MCCALL ALL guys who might give george a reason to start moving around and all guys who have a good shot to beat a few to be in reality the fav to win please dont mention cooney who fought once in 5 years |
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
vCash: 500 |
FOREMAN usually fought guys that could not stand up to him
and picked those guys well thats why he didnt not touch anyone from this list |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Pugilist Specialist
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,522
vCash: 500 |
I agree. Another thing is Foreman in no way would close the gap like Tyson, so Ruddock wouldn't feel forced to brawl. I see it mimicking the Bonecrusher fight except nobody gets knocked down or stopped unless maybe Ruddock goes down and gets up quickly.
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 293
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
He made Morrison, Holy, Cooper, Briggs fight off of the back foot, four guys who i wouldn't call weak. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 339
vCash: 500 |
go watch ruddock/weaver.......ruddock/broad....ruddock/alexander....ruddock/richardson you can see early in ruddocks career he lived off the jab....can sumbody post ruddock sparring with holmes from youtube its on there...ruddock in 1986 weighing 215 lbs helping larry holmes prepare for his rematch wit michael spinks...ruddock throws a lot of jabs in those 2 rds of sparring
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Steele the Tacoma Assasin
ESB Addict
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,445
vCash: 773 |
Quote:
imma listen to your posts your obviously a smart guy
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Journeyman
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 60
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Ruddock circa 87-89 was actually a highly mobile HW he could really move. But he abandoned this strategy in his career around the 2nd Tyson fight. So in theory Ruddock has the tools to move and box but as you say he really lacked the ring IQ or discipline to do this. Ruddock was very cocky in the ring. I see his blistering smash being negated by Foremans cross arm defence and Foreman would not have a problem with ruddocks power after all his second incarnation showed one of the best chins in HW history and noted punchers stewart,morrison,Moorer and Cooney couldnt dent him. FOREMAN patiently walks him down, there is a knockdown or 2 along the way before he stops him for good in the 7th. POST EDIT: I ACCIDENTALLY PUT RUDDOCK walks him down on last post I meant Foreman!! Last edited by Jamal Perkins; 01-24-2013 at 06:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
yes that was me, i also said it has nothing to do with boxing and if you ever went to a gym, you would know a grown man with 17inch arms is nothing special and is actually kinda on the smallish side for a heavyweight |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
holy and cooper were natural crusieweights and i do remember holyfield standing up to foreman for much of the fight that being said i made a list of big strong heavyweights of that time period and foreman who liked pushing guys around the ring SOMEHOW, managed not to fight A SINGLE ONE of them maybe it was cause he knew might not be able to do so |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
MAB.
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK, England
Posts: 36,388
vCash: 842 |
Foreman would win. Decision or late stoppage.
I really like Ruddock. Good puncher. Pretty trunks. That being said, by the time he was an established name he had discarded his underrated jab and instead tried to bang everyone out. You don't bang Foreman out. Instead, you hit him hard, repeatedly, until you start to become discouraged, and if you have nothing else to fall back on then he's going to hurt you. Razor had fantastic recuperative powers so in the event of a knockdown it's possible he could survive, but once plan A fails it's all downhill for Razor. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 216
vCash: 1000 |
Nobody beats the Foreman of 1990 in 1990 except for Evander Holyfield and even that was a competitive fight for Holyfield at his best.
Ruddock was not nearly as mentally strong as Foreman and would've cracked under pressure. |
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 293
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
Do you know anything about natural training? I'm guessing no. A sub 8% bodyfat 17 inch arm on someone of normal height is big. It's not particularly big for anyone that's fat or is on gear. |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Journeyman
ESB Jr Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 293
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
No. Every one of them was on the backfoot the whole fight. Holyfield outmuscled Tyson, he was no weakling. Briggs, Morrison, Cooper were big strong guys and they all fought off of the backfoot. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,726
vCash: 1000 |
Foreman was too slow and too easy to outbox by this stage. Against another puncher, I see him been beat to the punch and knocked out. Ofcourse he has a punchers chance but he also has a good chance of being sparked cold himself. In his prime he went life and death with Lyle, an older Foreman is allot slower with allot less fighting gas in his tank and doesn't do aswell in such a brawl
Rudduck KO5 I thought Tyson had 15/16 inch arms, could be wrong, not massive arms but conjusive to explosive punching |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|