|
|
|
#76 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,782
vCash: 1 |
Quote:
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bournemouth, England
Posts: 4,455
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I remember the ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ at the time. You proberbly got a BUZZ due to the fact that you live in a house plastered floor to ceiling in mirrors thus giving the effect that you had an army of mates with you yelping & squealing support for fishnets
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bournemouth, England
Posts: 4,455
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
I think Hagler/Mugabi was even put on at 8pm in the evening, i recall my missis setting up the small TV in the kitchin for me to watch it. She had her soaps shyte on in the lounge |
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,769
vCash: 910 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,782
vCash: 1 |
Quote:
The reality is outside of a few Heavyweights, no American boxer has had British mainstream appeal since the 1980s. De La Hoya and Trinidad may of been two of the biggest names in boxing in the 1990's, but as neither was British, that fact did not what register with the mainstream British audience. The BBC and ITV are ratings driven, and have no doubt if it was felt De La Hoya and Trinidad could get them the ratings, the fight would of been on terrestrial TV. The reality was the fight cost too much for too little ratings for any terrestrial station to show it. So it went to a specialist station, who made up for lack of viewers by charging a premium to watch the fight. If that premium was not paid, the fight would not of even been on in the British market. That is not the evidence of a huge fight in the UK... |
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Up Top To The Head
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,769
vCash: 910 |
Wrong. The biggest fights and sport events went to Sky because they had the money to pay for the syndication. They had the money because they had the most viewers.
Sky wasn't a "specialist station" it was the biggest network in Britan and still is. |
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of London
Posts: 9,782
vCash: 1 |
Quote:
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] All four combined SKY Sports channels have 2.1% of TV viewing, BBC One on itself has over 20% and combine that with all BBC output the figure rises to over 30% excluding radio. |
|
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sunderland
Posts: 5,182
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Well known by boxing fans and some other sports fans but not the average guy in the street. You're wrong on Sky as well,It is the biggest satellite broadcaster but the viewing numbers would be well down on any fight that was on the main terrestrial broadcasters like the BBC and ITV. Fighters like Ali,Frazier,Benn,Eubank,McGuighan and Hatton and even Khan everybody knows in the UK but I'm afraid Oscar barely registers |
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,394
vCash: 500 |
why haven't you faggots mentioned Floyd vs. Oscar?
Technically its the biggest fight in terms of PPV numbers ... some how it surpassed Tyson vs. Holyfield II, which was the biggest heavyweight fight of the 90s. |
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,463
vCash: 1000 |
Floyd v Oscar was just on regular sky nobody was really bothering with it in britain. Ali v Frazier on tape delay done 20 million viewing figures in 1971. Mind boggling!
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|