|
|
|
#47 |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: "Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it."
Posts: 12,035
vCash: 856 |
Deontay Wilder and Bryant Jennings are the real thing. Malik Scott is most likely to be the Black Ty Fields. That might be a little harsh on Scott, but I don't see him breaking in to the top 10. I think the jurry is still out on Joe Hanks and Amir Mansour.
|
|
|
|
#48 | ||
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,018
vCash: 86 |
Quote:
Dont think neither Banks or Mitchell will win anything. Banks havent beat anybody and Mitchell have a weak chin. Malik Scott though,I have high hopes for him too ![]() True and false. Heavyweights in America needs to get TV time. HBO have two fights coming up. Arreola vs. Stiverne and Mitchell vs. Banks II. NBC Sports got Scott vs. Glazkov. So there is still hope. Quote:
Scott has been boxing all his life. He started at a young age. Fields like Mitchell wasnt a boxer. He picked up boxing very late. I agree that Hanks and Mansour is hard to get clever on. |
||
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,417
vCash: 1847 |
Quote:
![]() horrible, horrible analogy. Malik Scott is a pure boxer who was on the US Olympic team and has rarely lost a round in his career against admittedly so-so competition. He has very good skills with limited power. Tye Fields is an uncoordinated freak show who hammered down a few physically overmatched opponents. He has power but no skill whatsoever. |
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
#TeamHughie
ESB Addict
Join Date: May 2010
Location: London
Posts: 2,188
vCash: 544 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,364
vCash: 0 |
when the hell is Joe Hanks gonna get a fight that's at least on Solo boxeo tecate or whatever TV station. seen nothing of him, unless you want to count a video on youtube from 4 years ago.
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,417
vCash: 18 |
Quote:
Now they have him as 23, and a 74" reach. 74" ? That's an even bigger disadvantage. Tyson's reach was even shorter, but Ruiz is no Tyson. Well, at least now he has time. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Gatekeeper
ESB Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Finchley LDN
Posts: 317
vCash: 925 |
You can already see Wilder, Jennings and maybe Scott will all compete at high level in the future, comparing to who was getting hyped up a few years back (Grano, Kauffmann)
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington State, USA
Posts: 9,229
vCash: 150 |
I'm honestly not that familiar with 3-5. Pretty much the top 2 than everybody else. And Wilder is hype, but the bottom line is that he won an Olympic medal and has stopped every opponent to date in his pro career. And his resume is no weaker than everybody not named Jennings with this qualification.
1. Jennings 2. Wilder 3. Mansour 4. Scott 5. Hanks |
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,018
vCash: 86 |
I would say that Malik Scott is the most skillfull and technical boxer of them all.
He is a boxer andhave been doing it all his life. Dont think many can outbox or outjab him. |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|