|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hong Kong via Sunderland
Posts: 3,605
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Nash Equilibrium Debunker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 123,310
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
Say he moves up and takes whatever the current best at 175 can dish out, would you amend your stance to Conteh on points or is there naught Ward can realistically prove to sway you? |
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hong Kong via Sunderland
Posts: 3,605
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
If Conteh was around now he'd be clear no.1 LHW IMO, without a doubt. But yeah if he shows he is strong/durable at the weight (which he probably will be) then I'd prob change to Conteh points. I just don't give out credit based on potential, especially when we've never seen the guy at that weight AND especially against a Brit! |
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Nash Equilibrium Debunker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 123,310
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
![]() ...and, I'd wager, Froch has a close enough approximation of light heavyweight strength even at 168. He more than held his own against Pascal, who's a bull since moving up. I don't think it's entirely attributable to Pascal being drained, either. Froch is a strong bastard. Obviously he's miles behind Conteh in technical proficiency and diversity, but as a barometer of Ward's ability to handle another eight pounds of world class athlete bearing down on him he suits well enough. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|