|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Who wins | |||
| Taylor PTS |
|
3 | 33.33% |
| Taylor KO |
|
0 | 0% |
| Hamsho PTS |
|
1 | 11.11% |
| Hamsho KO |
|
5 | 55.56% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#5 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salisbury, MD
Posts: 3,710
vCash: 1000 |
I guess I must go back and revisit some Hamsho footage, because I don't see what everyone else is seeing???
I like Taylor 8-4 in a comfortable fight where he controls the pace...but perhaps I will change my mind??? |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 6,888
vCash: 1000 |
Quote:
Unless your name is Marvin Hagler, you're gonna have a hell of a time controlling the pace with THAT guy in front of you. Taylor doesn't have the strength, stamina, or inside skills to compete with a guy like that. Hamsho would absolutely steamroll him. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
ESB Junkie
East Side VIP
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 30,705
vCash: 1000 |
I think Taylor went downhill after Hopkins, he looked to have good stamina against Joppy and he was pretty good against Winky Wright, then he just got worse and worse. He was tense but I think he lost his stamina too
Taylor at his best I think can win a UD |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Contender
ESB Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 717
vCash: 500 |
Taylor would be unable to keep Hamsho off of him; he didn't move well enough and he certainly didn't hit hard enough. And once Hamsho got close, he'd simply work Taylor over. Very very wide UD or a late stoppage for Hamsho. He was the #2 MW, behind only Hagler for a long time and he beat many of the other top guys.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Fighting Zapata
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,443
vCash: 500 |
Hamsho was a legit top contender for sure and earned both his shots, but i don't think he ever was a clear number two middle for any length of time.Not in a Duran-Dejesus, Ortiz-Laguna, Monzon-Valdez sense anyway.
He got the first shot on the back of the Scypion, Parker and Minter wins, but Parker was a gift and Minter was very reticent and past his prime by then...he would be obliterated much more impressively by Sibson. parker again, Czyz(a protected fraud who would do better at 175)and Benitez before the rematch. It's not really any more than Sibson, Mugabi, Roldan, Davison...were doing.Hamsho was up there but not ahead of the pack.He just a better presence on the American east coast scene than most which was vital considering Hagler was champ. he'd beat Taylor comfortably.Taylor was strained and couldn't contain the slow footed pressure of Pavlik, Froch and Hamsho brings much more heat than either, though not as much power but that wouldn't matter. |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Undisputed Champion
East Side VIP
Join Date: May 2009
Location: out preaching for the church of benn
Posts: 10,075
vCash: 1054 |
Quote:
Good post For me the minter fight could of gone either way in fact I had minter ahead by a point I think |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada!!!!
Posts: 2,305
vCash: 500 |
he was too busy looking for a knock out against a MUCH smaller boxer in ouma to actually outbox him. to paraphrase a previous post, he was too busy trying to win the fight to win rounds. that pretty much sums up his post-hopkins efforts
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|