|
|
||||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Is Mundine an Aussie ATG? | |||
| Yes, clearly. (specify where in top 10, please) |
|
4 | 11.43% |
| Maybe/borderline. |
|
11 | 31.43% |
| No. |
|
20 | 57.14% |
| Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | ||||||
|
Nash Equilibrium Debunker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 123,312
vCash: 0 |
This got me to thinking:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What are your informed opinions?
|
||||||
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,731
vCash: 500 |
not top ten. good fighter though. only ever 'just' world class at his peak. excelled himself last night obviously.
pity is, his circus goes on. i sniff a rematch one daywith geale, that may prove to be a retirement fund for daniel when his career is ended. ggg may bring that closer. darcy sands fenech rose fammo tony mundine thompson richards harding Carruthers Darchinyan tszu Young Griffo Rocky Mattioli Barry Michael Vic Patrick all rate higher than mundine. quality of opposition must be taken into account, and how a fighter fared when pitted against the best. |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Nash Equilibrium Debunker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 123,312
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
Strongly agree. ![]() Green & Geale are nice results on paper, but the latter is controversial. After that he's got Kim, Soliman x3, Echols, and I guess Thornberry as his next shiniest. Hardly the stuff of legend. That interim WBA title doesn't rate for me, nor does Rigo Alvarez himself. On the theme of performance weighed against quality opposition, I thought Kessler beat him by nearer the Dutch judge's shutout card than the other two. Very little to criticize about the Dane's performance; he really controlled The Man. Getting dropped by Siaca and put to sleep by Ottke in your relative prime doesn't earn high marks, either. Still, he did hang around a long time and remain in the rankings by hook or by crook. He beat a lot of so-so types comfortably enough and makes a case for himself just through longevity and having overachieved with a late start for boxing. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Nash Equilibrium Debunker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 123,312
vCash: 0 |
Also, how did I overlook Harding?
That is an obvious one.I must confess to not knowing fuck all about Sands, Richards, Mattioli, Michael or Patrick...but I'll take your word for it. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,731
vCash: 500 |
Sands, Richards, Mattioli were all stand out fighters from a stronger era. michael was a world champ. almost too old by the time he got his chance. great little fighter.
patrick also fought in a stronger era, and won aus biggest ever local fight. beat tommy burns. vic stepped up to welter from lightweight to win it. burns was the favourite. vic kod him. |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,731
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
i dont consider bugner an aussie fighter. absolutely a great. but he had his real career out of the uk. geale i rate higher. forgot him... green possibly. but mundine beat him.a case could be made for green regarding quality of opposition.troy waters, also was a goodun. on a level with mundine. a car accident gave him injuries that hobbled his career. shannon taylor is about even with choc imo. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Nash Equilibrium Debunker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 123,312
vCash: 0 |
Taylor, eh?
![]() I suppose he did clean up at domestic level for a time, and was only the 3rd man of twenty to carry Arthur Abraham the distance. Got annihilated by prime Sugar Shane, not that it's any blight. Also lost h2h to Mundine, like Green. I want to say he lost to a few poorer types than Mundine did, but there is always Wood... KO1 Bramble is a terrific feat, too. At least on par with Mundine's best stoppage (Soliman II) |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Champion
East Side Guru
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,253
vCash: 1000 |
NO not Aussie top ten IMO , and he should consider himself lucky his country of birth was way down in Australia because if he was from the Northern Hemisphere he would have been getting KTFO on a regular basis if he had to have had fought either here in Europe or Stateside .
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Nash Equilibrium Debunker
East Side VIP
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 123,312
vCash: 0 |
Quote:
He is getting more votes of confidence up in the General Forum than down under! |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Belt holder
ESB Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,731
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
unlikeothers, im not impressed with him fighting so late in life. i know he was trained to be a fighter from birth. he hung around his old mans gym all his life, and was taught by tonys trainers etc to fight. he even had some am fights. so li dont get carried away with his raw potential, because he WASNT raw when he 'took up' boxing. so in his early career, i see mundine fighting old and retired fighters. which is fair enough to start. he then shows his balls in stepping up to fight the undefeated, if not brutal, sven ottke. mundine did fine. but got ko'd by a man not considered much of a puncher. so questions are there regarding his durability. something that must be also considered when judging a fighter. (then there was wood). then every time he stepped up he got beat. his best wins were green, thornberry, soliman and echols. 3 locals and a standard contender. rick thornberry was past his prime. had they fought at both age 26. i have thornberry taking it. rick won the first 4 rounds of their fight, when rick was past it. mundine struggles to make the top 20. doesnt make the top 15. but thats just my opinion. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|